system/nxplayer/nxrecorder: move apb buffer instance to stack

[anchao]

Summary

system/nxplayer/nxrecorder: move apb buffer instance to stack

move apb buffer instance to stack to avoid alloc buffer from heap

Signed-off-by: chao an [email protected]

Impact

N/A

Testing

ci-check

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of the change, it lacks crucial details.

Here's a breakdown of the missing information:

• Insufficient Summary: While the summary explains what was changed, it doesn't fully explain why. Why is allocating from the heap problematic in this specific case? What benefits does moving to the stack provide (e.g., performance improvement, deterministic memory usage, avoiding heap fragmentation)? What is "apb buffer"? More context is needed. It also lacks any mention of related issues.

• Missing Impact Assessment: Simply stating "N/A" is insufficient. Even seemingly small changes can have unforeseen impacts. Consider these points:

  • Impact on hardware: Does this change affect any specific architectures or boards? It's unlikely, but needs explicit confirmation.
  • Impact on compatibility: Does this change affect any existing applications using the nxrecorder? Again, unlikely but needs to be addressed.
  • Impact on security: While unlikely in this case, always consider potential security implications. For example, does moving the buffer to the stack introduce any risks related to stack overflow? Explicitly stating "NO" with a brief justification is better than "N/A".

• Inadequate Testing: "ci-check" is not sufficient. While CI is important, the PR needs to demonstrate specific tests performed locally that validate the change. What functionality was tested? What were the expected results? Providing actual log snippets (even if they're short and show expected behavior) is crucial for reviewers to understand the testing process. Furthermore, the details of the build host and target(s) are missing.

In short: The PR needs more detail and explicit confirmation (even if negative) for several impact categories. The testing section requires significant improvement to show how the changes were validated.

[cederom]

Thank you @anchao :-)