Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-13989 Reduced the number of constructors in JsonTreeRowRecordReader down to one. #9506

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

dan-s1
Copy link
Contributor

@dan-s1 dan-s1 commented Nov 8, 2024

Summary

NIFI-13989

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 21

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

Copy link
Contributor

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this cleanup @dan-s1. The general approach looks good, and I recommend introducing a reusable method in TestJsonTreeRowRecordReader to reduce the duplication.

@dan-s1
Copy link
Contributor Author

dan-s1 commented Nov 8, 2024

@exceptionfactory Is it okay if I also take care of the various Intellij warnings e.g.

  • 'assertTrue()' can be simplified to 'assertInstanceOf()'
  • Explicit type argument String, Object can be replaced with <>
  • Variable 'mre' is never used
  • Can be replaced with 'getFirst()' call
    ?

@exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

@exceptionfactory Is it okay if I also take care of the various Intellij warnings e.g.

* 'assertTrue()' can be simplified to 'assertInstanceOf()'

* Explicit type argument String, Object can be replaced with <>

* Variable 'mre' is never used

* Can be replaced with 'getFirst()' call
  ?

Sure, sounds good!

@exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like the last commit has a few Checkstyle violations:

Warning:  src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/json/TestJsonTreeRowRecordReader.java:[461,85] (whitespace) WhitespaceAfter: ',' is not followed by whitespace.
Warning:  src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/json/TestJsonTreeRowRecordReader.java:[535,121] (whitespace) WhitespaceAfter: ',' is not followed by whitespace.
Warning:  src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/json/TestJsonTreeRowRecordReader.java:[535,155] (whitespace) WhitespaceAfter: ',' is not followed by whitespace.
Warning:  src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/json/TestJsonTreeRowRecordReader.java:[1327] (sizes) LineLength: Line is longer than 200 characters (found 203).
Warning:  src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/json/TestJsonTreeRowRecordReader.java:[1328,55] (whitespace) WhitespaceAfter: ',' is not followed by whitespace.

@dan-s1
Copy link
Contributor Author

dan-s1 commented Nov 11, 2024

@exceptionfactory I have corrected the Checkstyle violations. Please review at your earliest convenience. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the cleanup @dan-s1! +1 merging

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory merged commit f15b7ca into apache:main Nov 12, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants