Skip to content

Conversation

@gensericghiro
Copy link
Contributor

@gensericghiro gensericghiro commented Nov 20, 2025

Summary

As a follow-up to #20906, also removing the process-id tag from 4.1.
This is because when working on
KIP-1091, we mistakenly applied the process-id tag to all client-level
metrics, rather than just the client-state, thread-state, and
recording-level metrics as specified in the KIP.

Tests

Unit tests in ClientMetricsTest.java and StreamsMetricsImplTest.java

Reviewers: Bill Bejeck[email protected]

Copy link
Member

@bbejeck bbejeck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mjsax mjsax merged commit 1647610 into apache:4.1 Nov 21, 2025
29 of 32 checks passed
mjsax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
As a follow-up to #20906, also removing the process-id tag from 4.1.
This is because when working on
KIP-1091, we mistakenly applied the process-id tag to all client-level
metrics, rather than just the client-state, thread-state, and
recording-level metrics as specified in the KIP.

Unit tests in `ClientMetricsTest.java` and `StreamsMetricsImplTest.java`

Reviewers: Matthias Sax <[email protected]>, Bill Bejeck<[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants