-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
WIP: Dummy PR to check maint-22.0.0 status #47750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
raulcd
wants to merge
13
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
maint-22.0.0
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
+802
−313
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rted image (#47730) ### Rationale for this change Old image fails due to debian update ### What changes are included in this PR? Use newer image ### Are these changes tested? Will submit crossbow run ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: #47705 Authored-by: Nic Crane <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nic Crane <[email protected]>
### Rationale for this change #45964 changed paths of pre-built Apache Arrow C++ binaries for R. But we forgot to update the nightly upload job. ### What changes are included in this PR? Update paths in the nightly upload job. ### Are these changes tested? No... ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. * GitHub Issue: #47704 Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nic Crane <[email protected]>
…47743) ### Rationale for this change Valgrind would report memory leaks induced by protobuf initialization on library load, for example: ``` ==14628== 414 bytes in 16 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 22 of 26 ==14628== at 0x4914EFF: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:487) ==14628== by 0x8D0B6CA: void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) [clone .isra.0] (in /opt/conda/envs/arrow/lib/libprotobuf.so.25.3.0) ==14628== by 0x8D33E62: google::protobuf::DescriptorPool::Tables::Tables() (in /opt/conda/envs/arrow/lib/libprotobuf.so.25.3.0) ==14628== by 0x8D340E2: google::protobuf::DescriptorPool::DescriptorPool(google::protobuf::DescriptorDatabase*, google::protobuf::DescriptorPool::ErrorCollector*) (in /opt/conda/envs/arrow/lib/libprotobuf.so.25.3.0) ==14628== by 0x8D341A2: google::protobuf::DescriptorPool::internal_generated_pool() (in /opt/conda/envs/arrow/lib/libprotobuf.so.25.3.0) ==14628== by 0x8D34277: google::protobuf::DescriptorPool::InternalAddGeneratedFile(void const*, int) (in /opt/conda/envs/arrow/lib/libprotobuf.so.25.3.0) ==14628== by 0x8D9C56F: google::protobuf::internal::AddDescriptorsRunner::AddDescriptorsRunner(google::protobuf::internal::DescriptorTable const*) (in /opt/conda/envs/arrow/lib/libprotobuf.so.25.3.0) ==14628== by 0x40D147D: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:70) ==14628== by 0x40D1567: call_init (dl-init.c:33) ==14628== by 0x40D1567: _dl_init (dl-init.c:117) ==14628== by 0x40EB2C9: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) ``` This was triggered by the `libprotobuf` upgrade on conda-forge from 3.21.12 to 4.25.3. ### What changes are included in this PR? Add a Valgrind suppression for these leak reports, as there is probably not much we can do about them. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by existing CI test. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: #47742 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
…Parquet data (#47741) ### Rationale for this change Fix issues found by OSS-Fuzz when invalid Parquet data is fed to the Parquet reader: * https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/447262173 * https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/447480433 * https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/447490896 * https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/447693724 * https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/447693728 * https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/449498800 ### Are these changes tested? Yes, using the updated fuzz regression files from apache/arrow-testing#115 ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. **This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** (If the changes fix either (a) a security vulnerability, (b) a bug that caused incorrect or invalid data to be produced, or (c) a bug that causes a crash (even when the API contract is upheld), please provide explanation. If not, you can remove this.) * GitHub Issue: #47740 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
### Rationale for this change Mimalloc default generates LSE atomic instructions only work on armv8.1. This causes illegal instruction on armv8.0 platforms like Raspberry4. This PR sets mimalloc build flag -DMI_NO_OPT_ARCH=ON to disable LSE instruction. Please note even with flag set, compiler and libc will replace the atmoic call with an ifunc that matches hardware best at runtime. That means LSE is used only if the running platform supports it. ### What changes are included in this PR? Force mimalloc build flag -DMI_NO_OPT_ARCH=ON. ### Are these changes tested? Manually tested. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. **This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** Fixes crashes on Armv8.0 platform. * GitHub Issue: #47229 Lead-authored-by: Yibo Cai <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
### Rationale for this change According to microsoft/mimalloc#1073 , mimalloc v3 is preferred over v2 for production usage. There are reports of higher than expected memory consumption with mimalloc 2.2.x, notably when reading Parquet data (example: GH-47266). ### What changes are included in this PR? Bump to mimalloc 3.1.5, which is the latest mimalloc 3.1.x release as of this writing. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by existing tests and CI. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Hopefully not, besides a potential reduction in memory usage due to improvements in mimalloc v3. * GitHub Issue: #47588 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
### Rationale for this change There are link errors with build options for JNI on macOS. ### What changes are included in this PR? `ARROW_BUNDLED_STATIC_LIBS` has CMake target names defined in Apache Arrow not `find_package()`-ed target names. So we should use `aws-c-common` not `AWS::aws-c-common`. Recent aws-c-common or something use the Network framework. So add `Network` to `Arrow::arrow_bundled_dependencies` dependencies. Don't use `compute/kernels/temporal_internal.cc` in `libarrow.dylib` and `libarrow_compute.dylib` to avoid duplicated symbols error. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. * GitHub Issue: #47748 Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
### Rationale for this change This is for preventing to break Apache Arrow Java JNI use case on Linux. ### What changes are included in this PR? * Add a CI job that uses build options for JNI use case * Install more packages in manylinux image that is also used by JNI build ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: #47632 Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
### Rationale for this change `archery docker push` doesn't support custom Docker registry such as ghcr.io. ### What changes are included in this PR? Parse Docker image tag and specify Docker registry name to `docker push` if it's specified in the tag. Docker image tag format: `[HOST[:PORT]/]NAMESPACE/REPOSITORY[:TAG]` See also: https://docs.docker.com/reference/cli/docker/image/tag/#description ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: #47795 Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
…47616) ### Rationale for this change Python 3.14 is currently in a prerelease status and is expected to have a final release in October this year (https://peps.python.org/pep-0745/). We should ensure we are fully ready to support Python 3.14 for the PyArrow 22 release. ### What changes are included in this PR? This PR updates wheels for Python 3.14. ### Are these changes tested? Tested in the CI and with extended builds. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No, but users will be able to use PyArrow with Python 3.14. * GitHub Issue: #47438 --- Todo: - Update the image revision name in `.env` - Add 3.14 conda build ([arrow/dev/tasks/tasks.yml](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/d803afcc43f5d132506318fd9e162d33b2c3d4cd/dev/tasks/tasks.yml#L809)) when conda-forge/pyarrow-feedstock#156 is merged Follow-ups: - #47437 Authored-by: AlenkaF <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <[email protected]>
…47804) Found by OSS-Fuzz, should fix https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/451150486. Ensure RLE run is within bounds before reading it. Yes, by fuzz regression test in ASAN/UBSAN build. No. **This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** (If the changes fix either (a) a security vulnerability, (b) a bug that caused incorrect or invalid data to be produced, or (c) a bug that causes a crash (even when the API contract is upheld), please provide explanation. If not, you can remove this.) * GitHub Issue: #47803 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
### Rationale for this change Summarise changes for release ### What changes are included in this PR? Update NEWS file ### Are these changes tested? No ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: #47738 Authored-by: Nic Crane <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
@github-actions crossbow submit --group verify-rc-source |
@github-actions crossbow submit --group packaging |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
2 tasks
25 tasks
…l patch from conda (#47810) ### Rationale for this change Our verify-rc-source Windows job is failing due to patch not being available for Windows. ### What changes are included in this PR? Move patch requirement from `conda_env_cpp.txt` to `conda_env_unix.txt` ### Are these changes tested? Yes via CI and archery. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: #47809 Authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
@github-actions crossbow submit --group verify-rc-source |
@github-actions crossbow submit --group packaging |
Revision: e2fa94c Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-b13364f3c7 |
Revision: e2fa94c Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-16ccf7e6da |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting committer review
Awaiting committer review
CI: Extra: Package: Linux
Run extra Linux Packages CI
Component: C++
Component: Documentation
Component: Gandiva
Component: Parquet
Component: Python
Component: R
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Caution
Do not merge this PR.
This PR is being used to test the status of the 22.0.0 release branch on CI and should not be merged.