Skip to content

ci(workflow): optimize syntax #2292

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jun 2, 2025
Merged

ci(workflow): optimize syntax #2292

merged 18 commits into from
Jun 2, 2025

Conversation

jorgepiloto
Copy link
Member

This pull-request takes advantage of matrix jobs to short the workflow files, enhancing maintenance and readability.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.93%. Comparing base (134728f) to head (c3f9101).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2292      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.97%   83.93%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines       10399    10399              
==========================================
- Hits         8733     8728       -5     
- Misses       1666     1671       +5     

@moe-ad
Copy link
Contributor

moe-ad commented May 22, 2025

Switching to ready for review to inspect action runs.

@moe-ad moe-ad marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2025 07:22
@moe-ad
Copy link
Contributor

moe-ad commented May 30, 2025

Triggered release workflow for testing validity:
https://github.com/ansys/pydpf-core/actions/runs/15343136217

@moe-ad moe-ad requested a review from PProfizi May 30, 2025 09:08
Copy link
Member Author

@jorgepiloto jorgepiloto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, @moe-ad. Thanks for completing this. It is nice to see things compressed and are more readable now.

@moe-ad
Copy link
Contributor

moe-ad commented May 30, 2025

Thanks @jorgepiloto. I think @PProfizi needs update repo settings before we can merge:
image

@PProfizi PProfizi merged commit 8f37eab into master Jun 2, 2025
42 checks passed
@PProfizi PProfizi deleted the ci/optimize branch June 2, 2025 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants