You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
fix: branch-protection bypass actor + engines allowlist 加 glm #196
Thanks for this clear issue. Summary: (P1) remove the bypass_actors block from branch-protection.ts — the S7 pipeline-fix label is the sole branch-protection bypass, not a ruleset-level actor; (P2) add glm to ALLOWED_PROVIDERS in engines/actions.ts since GLM is the default passthrough. Your test plan looks solid — pnpm typecheck + pnpm test green, and the S7 reviewer confirm is a good call. Routing to development pipeline.
🤖 Claude self-acceptance (M8 workload=standard). accepted-by-claude applied — Module 4 develop-gate will pick this up. Maintainer may override with rejected.
Claude analysed the issue and concluded no code change is required — pre-sha == post-sha, so no commit was made. Downstream modules (pr-lifecycle → verify) will NOT fire.
Maintainer action required:
Re-triage the issue — the acceptance criteria may already be satisfied by existing code
OR refine the issue body and re-dispatch code-generate.yml
Activity
github-actions commentedon Jul 22, 2026
Thanks for this clear issue. Summary: (P1) remove the
bypass_actorsblock frombranch-protection.ts— the S7 pipeline-fix label is the sole branch-protection bypass, not a ruleset-level actor; (P2) addglmto ALLOWED_PROVIDERS inengines/actions.tssince GLM is the default passthrough. Your test plan looks solid —pnpm typecheck+pnpm testgreen, and the S7 reviewer confirm is a good call. Routing to development pipeline.akushonkamen commentedon Jul 22, 2026
🤖 Claude self-acceptance (M8 workload=standard).
accepted-by-claudeapplied — Module 4 develop-gate will pick this up. Maintainer may override withrejected.fix(app): ConfigureStep JSX 引号转义 + 同步 S7 bypass 说明
github-actions commentedon Jul 22, 2026
Claude analysed the issue and concluded no code change is required —
pre-sha == post-sha, so no commit was made. Downstream modules (pr-lifecycle → verify) will NOT fire.Maintainer action required:
code-generate.ymlWorkflow run
akushonkamen commentedon Jul 22, 2026
✅ Verify passed — Module 6 (test) engaged. PR: #197
akushonkamen commentedon Jul 22, 2026
✅ Verify passed — Module 6 (test) engaged. PR: #197
fix(app): branch-protection bypass actor 删除 + engines allowlist 加 glm
fix(app): ConfigureStep JSX 引号转义 + 同步 S7 bypass 说明
github-actions commentedon Jul 22, 2026
❌ Test:
failedTest framework: vitest v2.1.9
Existing test suite: 19/19 passed, 3 files ✓
✓ deploy-pipeline.test.ts (10 tests)
✓ quota.test.ts (6 tests)
✓ stripe.test.ts (3 tests)
Acceptance criteria coverage:
✗ P1: branch-protection.ts 删除 bypass_actors 块 (S7 合规修复) — NO COVERAGE
(branch-protection.ts 没有任何测试; 现有 deploy-pipeline tests 只覆盖 parseLabelsYml, DEFAULT_VARS, diffVars)
✗ P2: engines/actions.ts ALLOWED_PROVIDERS 加 'glm' — NO COVERAGE
(actions.ts 没有任何测试; ALLOWED_PROVIDERS set 和 provider 校验逻辑完全未测试)
Outcome: 19/19 tests pass, but both P1 and P2 acceptance criteria have zero test coverage. 这是重大缺口: S7 合规修复和 glm provider 添加均未经测试验证。
akushonkamen commentedon Jul 22, 2026
🔄 Auto-retry 1/3
Failure summary (prior Module 6 run)
Test framework: vitest v2.1.9
Existing test suite: 19/19 passed, 3 files ✓
✓ deploy-pipeline.test.ts (10 tests)
✓ quota.test.ts (6 tests)
✓ stripe.test.ts (3 tests)
code-generate.yml will auto-trigger on the
test:retry-1label,fetch this comment as the prior-test-report, and re-run Module 4 to
fix the failure.
github-actions commentedon Jul 22, 2026