Skip to content

[research] Antigravity agent support — needs reporter input before merge - #17

Draft
mattpocock wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
research/antigravity-agent-support
Draft

[research] Antigravity agent support — needs reporter input before merge#17
mattpocock wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
research/antigravity-agent-support

Conversation

@mattpocock

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • No code changed in agents.ts — this is a research capture only, so the investigation into adding Antigravity as a request-logger agent isn't lost.
  • Adds request-logger/docs/antigravity-research.md: what's confirmed (Antigravity CLI honors GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL, the same env var the existing geminiapi-key provider already uses) vs. what's unverified/second-hand (whether the Antigravity IDE can be redirected through a proxy at all — one archived community project reports it can't via plain env-var/MITM/DNS).
  • Not ready to merge: I need more information from whoever requested this before writing a real catalogue entry — see "Open questions for the reporter" in the doc.

Open questions (blocking a real implementation)

  • IDE or CLI — which did you mean?
  • Have you gotten Antigravity to route through any custom base URL/proxy successfully? What host/setting worked?
  • Which model (Gemini 3 Pro vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5) were you running it against?
  • Do you have a captured request we could use as a fixture?

Test plan

  • Reporter confirms IDE vs. CLI and provides a working redirection method
  • A real request capture is obtained and attached (or a .request.txt)
  • Once confirmed, follow up with a real agents.ts entry + test, per the existing "Add an agent" contract in request-logger/README.md

No catalogue entry added yet — Antigravity CLI looks straightforward
(GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL already works for it), but the Antigravity IDE's
proxyability is unverified and second-hand. Capturing findings and open
questions so this isn't lost while we wait on input from the reporter.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant