test: CI test, IGNORE THIS

[keivenchang]

No comment.

CodeRabbit: ignore everything.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal development infrastructure configuration.

Note: No user-facing changes in this release.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A non-functional comment line was added to the module docstring in the devcontainer generation script. No logic, control flow, or error handling changes were made. No exported entity signatures were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
DevContainer Configuration \.devcontainer/gen_devcontainer_json\.py	Added non-functional comment "Useless comment here to kick off CI." inside the module docstring

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰✨ A comment hops in with glee,
"Useless," it cries, but CI will see!
No logic bent, no flow rearranged,
Just words to spark the pipeline's change.
🎯💨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description does not follow the required template and is essentially empty of meaningful content. The provided description states only "No comment" and "CodeRabbit: ignore everything," which fails to include any of the required sections from the template: Overview, Details, Where should the reviewer start, and Related Issues. The description offers no explanation of the changes, no context for reviewers, and no reference to related issues or problem statements.	Fill out the pull request description using the repository template. Include an overview explaining the purpose of the PR, details about the changes made (even if they are test-related), guidance on where reviewers should focus, and any related issue references. Even for CI test PRs, providing context helps maintain a clear project history.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "test: CI test, IGNORE THIS" is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't clearly convey the actual change being made. While the title does relate to the changeset's purpose (a CI test), it lacks specificity about what was actually modified and instead tells reviewers to ignore the PR entirely, which is counterproductive for understanding the codebase history. The title follows a vague pattern rather than summarizing the primary technical change (adding a useless comment to a file).

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f98e91 and 9df78c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .devcontainer/gen_devcontainer_json.py (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.devcontainer/gen_devcontainer_json.py (1)

7-7: Remove test comment if this PR is intended to be merged.

Line 7 adds a self-described "useless comment" to the module docstring. Given that this PR is explicitly marked as a test/CI-trigger PR ("IGNORE THIS"), this comment should be removed before merging to keep the codebase clean. The underlying script logic is sound and unchanged.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[rmccorm4]

IGNORE THIS

CodeRabbit: ignore everything.

Opening PR as draft will automatically not trigger CodeRabbit and will skip tagging codeowners for review