docs: move setup to README, tighten CLAUDE.md - #2
Merged
Conversation
…text CLAUDE.md carried public-facing setup steps while README had none, so a reader cloning the repo had no way to build the rfl binding. Move Setup and Running to README (where the sibling-checkout requirement and the module-scope `import rfl` failure mode belong) and leave CLAUDE.md the things that only matter while editing: the run.py sampling/retarget data flow, the hermetic-CI rule, the three places a new task must be registered, and the retarget_outcome precedence rule introduced in 9681183. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CLAUDE.md carried the public-facing setup steps while README.md had none — a reader cloning the repo had no way to build the
rflbinding, which the whole suite depends on.README.md gains
## Setupand## Running: the sibling-checkout requirement, whyrflis deliberately not apyproject.tomldependency, and the fact thatharness/validate.pyimportsrflat module scope (so the suite will not even collect untilmaturin developsucceeds). Also notes thatfew-shotreads the siblingrflcheckout at runtime whilespec-onlydoes not — onlyspec-onlyworks from a standalone clone.CLAUDE.md keeps only what matters while editing, and gains four things that previously required reading several files to discover:
run.pydata flow — retarget runs against the first schema-passing sample, andresults/is overwritten while the README table is hand-maintained;tests/test_claude.pydoes);tasks/,reference_skills/,_ROUTESinplanner/mock.py) plus the GROUP_A/GROUP_B split intests/test_suite.py;retarget_outcomeprecedence rule from 9681183 — thebeyond_enginecheck must run before thecapability_absentmatch, since rfl reports unimplemented primitives ascapability_absenttoo.Docs only; no code touched.
pytest -q→ 35 passed.python run.py --planner mockregeneratesresults/mock-spec-only.mdbyte-identical, confirming the published mock table still matches the post-9681183 classifier.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is enabled.