Skip to content

Add support for linux/arm/v7 platform#772

Open
CKGrafico wants to merge 1 commit intoViren070:mainfrom
CKGrafico:patch-1
Open

Add support for linux/arm/v7 platform#772
CKGrafico wants to merge 1 commit intoViren070:mainfrom
CKGrafico:patch-1

Conversation

@CKGrafico
Copy link

@CKGrafico CKGrafico commented Feb 28, 2026

Make compatible with
linux/arm/v7

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores

  • Expanded Docker image build support to include additional hardware platforms, enabling the application to run on a wider variety of devices.

Make compatible with 	
linux/arm/v7
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ef2378 and 9656360.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-docker.yml

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions Docker deployment workflow to expand multi-architecture support by adding the linux/arm/v7 platform to the Buildx configuration, alongside the existing linux/amd64 and linux/arm64 platforms.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docker Deployment Configuration
.github/workflows/deploy-docker.yml
Added linux/arm/v7 to the Buildx platforms in the Docker image build step, extending multi-architecture build support to include 32-bit ARM systems.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's hop across the platforms wide,
From x86 to ARM, we now provide,
V7 joins the pack with grace and cheer,
More devices now can build code here! 🏗️

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly and accurately describes the main change: adding linux/arm/v7 platform support to the Docker build process.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant