Add file that defines @types used in future versions

[SteffenBrinckmann]

Please review and add/edit the types your ELN needs.

[NicolasCARPi]

Moar types:

• protocol : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000272
• assay : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000070
• investigation / study : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000066
• study-design : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0500000
• material-processing : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000094
• specimen-collection : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000659
• data-analysis : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0200000
• dataset : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000100
• measurement : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000109
• document : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000310
• report : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000088
• publication : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000311
• image : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000101
• software : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000010
• chemical-entity : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24431
• cell-line : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0000031
• organism : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0100026
• device / equipment : http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000968

One thing I noticed: instrument-expansion currently points to Wikidata Q19841649, which appears to mean an expansion of a building or structure, so I don't think this is the intended concept. OBI_0000968 (device) could perhaps be used as a generic equipment/device type instead.

Also, I would probably avoid using reagent as a generic entity type. In OBI, OBI_0000086 represents a reagent role: e.g. sodium chloride is fundamentally a chemical entity which can have the role of a reagent in a particular context.

[NicolasCARPi]

Also, why don't you make a branch from the main repo instead of your fork? It's easier to not have to deal with a fork.

[SteffenBrinckmann]

Also, why don't you make a branch from the main repo instead of your fork? It's easier to not have to deal with a fork.

Because I made a mistake. Sorry, final version will be correct

[SteffenBrinckmann]

I hope I did not open a box of pandora with this attempt to unify scientific definitions. Already now we have similar terms experiment vs measurement with different urls,... Luckily we do not have a pressure to finish it soon.

If anybody wants this job and speed things up,...In the meantime, I can move this forward slowly.

One idea is to reach out to research stewarts, they might have entries, too

Also we should state the goals:

• we can have alternative definitions (measurement and experiment) with one URL.
• different terms have to be sufficiently different for "half of scientists"

What we basically aim for is a complete ontology of scientific terms for elns

[NicolasCARPi]

I hope I did not open a box of pandora

I have bad news for you....