Fix case-sensitive Weixin peer route matching - #233
Draft
kbestcar wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
14 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
lastRoute.to.ctx.Tofor outbound delivery.Why
Weixin may provide the same peer identifier with mixed-case characters while an OpenClaw binding stores its lowercase form. The exact route matcher then misses the intended binding and falls back to the default agent.
All identifiers used during validation were kept private; examples in the related issue are synthetic.
Fixes #232.
Validation
npm run typechecknpm run buildOPENCLAW_STATE_DIR=<temporary directory> npx vitest run --coverage=false— 397/397 tests passedThe repository's coverage command executes all 397 tests successfully but currently reports global branch coverage of 89.13% against its configured 90% threshold;
process-message.tsis excluded from coverage, so this patch does not change that metric.