Conversation
WalkthroughA call to recharge 10 points for a participant was added immediately after participant creation in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ParticipantFacade
participant PointService
participant MatchingService
User->>ParticipantFacade: createParticipant()
ParticipantFacade->>ParticipantFacade: create participant
ParticipantFacade->>PointService: rechargePoint(participant, 10)
ParticipantFacade->>MatchingService: matchPendingParticipants()
ParticipantFacade-->>User: return participantId
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Test Results47 tests 47 ✅ 1s ⏱️ Results for commit e86affa. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/main/java/org/festimate/team/api/facade/ParticipantFacade.java (3)
45-45: Consider extracting the point amount to a configuration constant.The hardcoded value of 10 points works for the current requirement, but extracting it to a constant or configuration property would improve maintainability and flexibility.
Consider this refactor to make the point amount configurable:
+ private static final int FESTIVAL_ENTRY_POINTS = 10; + @Transactional public EntryResponse createParticipant(Long userId, Long festivalId, ProfileRequest request) { // ... existing code ... Participant participant = participantService.createParticipant(user, festival, request); - pointService.rechargePoint(participant, 10); + pointService.rechargePoint(participant, FESTIVAL_ENTRY_POINTS); matchingService.matchPendingParticipants(participant);Alternatively, you could make it configurable via
@Value("${festival.entry.points:10}")if different festivals should have different point amounts.
45-45: Consider extracting the hardcoded point value to a configurable constant.The automatic point recharge functionality is well-placed within the transaction and execution flow. However, the hardcoded value
10reduces maintainability and flexibility.Consider extracting this to a constant or configuration property:
+ private static final int ENTRY_BONUS_POINTS = 10; + @Transactional public EntryResponse createParticipant(Long userId, Long festivalId, ProfileRequest request) { // ... existing code ... - pointService.rechargePoint(participant, 10); + pointService.rechargePoint(participant, ENTRY_BONUS_POINTS); // ... rest of method ... }Alternatively, consider making this configurable via application properties for different festival types or promotional periods.
45-45: Good implementation with considerations for robustness.The automatic point recharge feature is correctly placed after participant creation and before matching. However, consider the following improvements:
- Error handling: If
pointService.rechargePointfails, the entire transaction will rollback. Ensure this is the intended behavior.- Configuration: The hard-coded
10points might benefit from being configurable (e.g., via application properties or festival-specific settings).Consider making the point amount configurable:
- pointService.rechargePoint(participant, 10); + pointService.rechargePoint(participant, getInitialPointAmount());And add a method or configuration property for the initial point amount.
src/test/java/org/festimate/team/api/facade/ParticipantFacadeTest.java (2)
84-100: Well-structured test for the new point recharge feature.The test properly verifies both the point recharge and matching service calls, with appropriate mocking and assertions. The Korean display name is consistent with the existing test style.
Consider updating the existing test for consistency.
The existing
createParticipant_successtest (lines 72-82) doesn't verify the point recharge functionality. For consistency and completeness, consider updating it to also verify the point service call:@Test @DisplayName("참가자 생성 성공") void createParticipant_success() { when(userService.getUserByIdOrThrow(1L)).thenReturn(user); when(festivalService.getFestivalByIdOrThrow(1L)).thenReturn(festival); when(participantService.createParticipant(any(), any(), any())).thenReturn(participant); var response = participantFacade.createParticipant(1L, 1L, null); assertThat(response.participantId()).isNotNull(); + verify(pointService).rechargePoint(participant, 10); verify(matchingService).matchPendingParticipants(participant); }This would ensure all participant creation tests verify the complete behavior.
84-100: Well-structured test with room for enhancement.The test correctly verifies the point recharge functionality and maintains good test practices. Consider the following improvements:
- Test efficiency: Since this test largely duplicates
createParticipant_success, consider consolidating them or making this test more focused on the point-specific behavior.- Error scenario testing: Add tests for point recharge failure scenarios to ensure proper error handling.
Consider adding an error scenario test:
@Test @DisplayName("참가자 생성 시 포인트 충전 실패하면 롤백된다") void createParticipant_pointRecharge_fail() { when(userService.getUserByIdOrThrow(1L)).thenReturn(user); when(festivalService.getFestivalByIdOrThrow(1L)).thenReturn(festival); when(participantService.getParticipant(user, festival)).thenReturn(null); when(participantService.createParticipant(any(), any(), any())).thenReturn(participant); doThrow(new RuntimeException("Point service unavailable")) .when(pointService).rechargePoint(participant, 10); assertThatThrownBy(() -> participantFacade.createParticipant(1L, 1L, null)) .isInstanceOf(RuntimeException.class); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/org/festimate/team/api/facade/ParticipantFacade.java(1 hunks)src/test/java/org/festimate/team/api/facade/ParticipantFacadeTest.java(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: Build Test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/test/java/org/festimate/team/api/facade/ParticipantFacadeTest.java (1)
84-100: Excellent test coverage for the new point recharge feature.This test method effectively verifies the new automatic point charging functionality while maintaining coverage of existing behavior. The implementation demonstrates good testing practices:
- Proper mock setup ensuring no existing participant conflicts
- Verification of both the new functionality (
pointService.rechargePoint) and existing behavior (matchingService.matchPendingParticipants)- Clear, descriptive Korean display name that matches the business requirement
- Consistent with existing test patterns in the class
📌 PR 제목
[feat] #147 페스티벌 입장 시 자동으로 포인트 충전하는 기능 구현
📌 PR 내용
🛠 작업 내용
🔍 관련 이슈
Closes #147
📸 스크린샷 (Optional)
📚 레퍼런스 (Optional)
N/A
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests