Crosswalk the W3C memory interop scope onto the evidence profile - #106
Merged
Conversation
The AI Agent Memory Interoperability Community Group is chartered to specify
portable agent memory. Its published scope covers cell shape, identity binding,
encryption envelopes, audit anchors, sharing contracts, cryptographic erasure,
and crosswalks to regulatory and protocol ecosystems. Two distinctions this
directory already carries sit inside "portable memory" and are named by none of
those areas:
derivation three validly signed cells derived from one observation are
three sources to any consumer that does not carry
`derived_from`. Nothing is forged; the count is wrong.
search coverage a query that reached 1 of 26 partitions and found nothing
transports as "not found" without `search.coverage`.
The crosswalk maps each scope area to the profile field that carries it and to
the failure that becomes unobservable when the field is absent, with an existing
fixture on every row.
The left column quotes the group's own scope page rather than field names,
because the group has published a scope and not a specification. There is no
vocabulary to map onto yet. A crosswalk whose left column was imagined would
assert a correspondence it never checked -- the failure these fixtures exist to
catch -- so the document says which it is and what should replace it.
Read from https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/ai-agent-memory-interop/ on 18 Aug 2026.
No new fixtures: the two cases were already here. Nothing is sent anywhere by
this commit, and Minority Prophet is named only as where the cases were found.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Crosswalk only. No new fixtures, no schema change, nothing sent anywhere.
The W3C AI Agent Memory Interoperability Community Group is chartered to specify portable agent memory. Its published scope covers cell shape, identity binding, encryption envelopes, audit anchors, sharing contracts, cryptographic erasure, and crosswalks to regulatory and protocol ecosystems.
Two distinctions this directory already carries sit inside "portable memory" and are named by none of those areas:
derived_from. Nothing is forged; the count is wrong.search.coverage.W3C-MEMORY-CROSSWALK.mdmaps each scope area to the field that carries it and to the failure that becomes unobservable when the field is absent, with an existing fixture on every row.On the left column
The group has published a scope, not a specification — there is no field vocabulary to map onto yet. So the left column quotes the group's own scope page rather than field names, and says so. A crosswalk whose left column was imagined would assert a correspondence it never checked, which is the failure these fixtures exist to catch. The document states what should replace it once field names exist.
Read from https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/ai-agent-memory-interop/ on 18 Aug 2026.
Checks
python3 interop/memory-evidence-profile-v0.1/validate.py→ PASS: 4 examples; 8 adversarial cases rejectedDraft: nothing here has been sent to the group, and doing so would be a separate decision.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code