Skip to content

Restore the v1.1.0 slot to its deposited artifacts, and prepare the v1.2.0 deposit #101

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Silentpartnercoding merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

Restore the v1.1.0 slot to its deposited artifacts, and prepare the v1.2.0 deposit #101

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 8 additions & 3 deletions .zenodo.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
"title": "The Minority Prophet Property: Copy-Invariant Evidence Aggregation in Rooted Claim Graphs",
"upload_type": "publication",
"publication_type": "preprint",
"publication_date": "2026-08-16",
"version": "1.1.0",
"description": "A peer-review candidate establishing conditional copy-invariance and root-margin sensitivity results for evidence aggregation over finite rooted claim graphs, with Lean-checked proofs and preregistered bounded validation.",
"publication_date": "2026-08-18",
"version": "1.2.0",
"description": "A peer-review candidate establishing conditional copy-invariance and root-margin sensitivity results for evidence aggregation over finite rooted claim graphs, with Lean-checked proofs and preregistered bounded validation. v1.2.0 adds one scope limitation: the aggregator answers a symmetric question and does not decide universal or existential claims. No result, proof, or validation number of v1.1.0 is retracted.",
"creators": [
{
"name": "He, James Siyuan"
Expand All @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
{
"identifier": "https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding/minority-prophet",
"relation": "isSupplementTo"
},
{
"identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.21965713",
"relation": "isNewVersionOf",
"scheme": "doi"
}
]
}
Binary file modified output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf
View file
Open in desktop
Binary file not shown.
37 changes: 36 additions & 1 deletion papers/peer-review/ARCHIVAL-INTEGRITY.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -44,7 +44,42 @@ File minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.2.0.pdf
DOI not yet assigned; no v1.2.0 deposit exists
```

## Open item for the owner: the tracked v1.1.0 PDF is not the deposited one
## RESOLVED: the tracked v1.1.0 artifacts are now the deposited ones

The v1.1.0 slot holds exactly what the v1.1.0 DOI resolves to. Both files were
restored from their published state, and the restoration was **verified, not
asserted**:

```text
manuscript restored from tag paper-v1.1.0
sha256 bffb546cfc8375c94fd64017f567d1708adc3df8eaeff4bd669c6dabce056998
PDF downloaded from the Zenodo deposit
sha256 10413b41a2e87a527e2f01a29ed0cdfe17245a61eb0d9a6ce0bf334ca096d3da
rebuild building the restored manuscript on a different machine reproduces
the deposited PDF BYTE-FOR-BYTE, same sha256 10413b41...
```

That third line is the one that matters. It shows the restoration is correct,
that the ReportLab build is deterministic across machines, and that the
version-derived build change introduced with v1.2.0 does **not** disturb the
reproduction of v1.1.0 — a hardcoded version string would have produced a
different PDF here and the check would have failed.

The DOI-bearing text that had drifted into the v1.1.0 slot now lives where it
belongs, in **v1.2.0**. The previously recorded `bb948d25…` regeneration is
superseded and is not tracked.

### The problem this closes, kept visible

> A reader of the repository's `v1.1.0` PDF was not reading the artifact the
> `v1.1.0` DOI resolved to.

The cause was benign and worth naming: the DOI was assigned *after* the artifact
was frozen, and the natural repair — regenerate the PDF with the DOI in it — was
applied to the version slot that must not change. The correct home for a
post-publication correction is the next version, never the published one.

## Superseded: open item for the owner (retained)

The repository's tracked `output/pdf/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.pdf`
hashes to `bb948d25…` — the DOI-bearing regeneration. The **Zenodo deposit**
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions papers/peer-review/minority-prophet-peer-review-v1.1.0.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
**James Siyuan He**
Preprint v1.1.0; not peer reviewed, 16 August 2026
Correspondence: https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding
Archival DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21965713
Archival DOI: not yet assigned

## Abstract

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ In a finite binary rooted-claim graph, counting declared roots rather than claim

## Data and code availability

All manuscript source, formal definitions and proofs, validation registrations, reference implementations, adverse findings, and result records are publicly available at https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding/minority-prophet. The reviewed source and PDF are fixed by the immutable `paper-v1.1.0` release tag. The archival preprint record, including the PDF and release archive, is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21965713.
All manuscript source, formal definitions and proofs, validation registrations, reference implementations, adverse findings, and result records are publicly available at https://github.com/Silentpartnercoding/minority-prophet. The peer-review candidate is versioned in `papers/peer-review/`. An immutable release tag and archival DOI will be assigned only after maintainer approval of the candidate; the absence of an assigned DOI does not affect review of the repository record.

## Ethics statement

Expand Down
Loading