Skip to content

Conversation

sivasathyaseeelan
Copy link
Contributor

@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan commented Jul 23, 2025

using JumpProcesses, DiffEqBase
using Test, LinearAlgebra, Statistics
using StableRNGs, Plots
rng = StableRNG(12345)

# Example system from Cao et al. (2007)
function define_stiff_system()
    # Reactions: S1 -> S2, S2 -> S1, S2 -> S3
    # Rate constants
    c = (1000.0, 1000.0, 1.0)
    
    # Define MassActionJump
    # Reaction 1: S1 -> S2
    reactant_stoich1 = [Pair(1, 1)]  # S1 consumed
    net_stoich1 = [Pair(1, -1), Pair(2, 1)]  # S1 -1, S2 +1
    # Reaction 2: S2 -> S1
    reactant_stoich2 = [Pair(2, 1)]  # S2 consumed
    net_stoich2 = [Pair(1, 1), Pair(2, -1)]  # S1 +1, S2 -1
    # Reaction 3: S2 -> S3
    reactant_stoich3 = [Pair(2, 1)]  # S2 consumed
    net_stoich3 = [Pair(2, -1), Pair(3, 1)]  # S2 -1, S3 +1
    
    jumps = MassActionJump([c[1], c[2], c[3]], [reactant_stoich1, reactant_stoich2, reactant_stoich3], 
                          [net_stoich1, net_stoich2, net_stoich3])
    
    return jumps
end

# Simulation parameters
u0 = [100, 0, 0]  # Initial conditions: S1=100, S2=0, S3=0
tspan = (0.0, 5.0)
p = nothing  # No additional parameters needed

# Define problem
prob = DiscreteProblem(u0, tspan, p)
jump_prob = JumpProblem(prob, PureLeaping(), define_stiff_system())

# Solve with SimpleImplicitTauLeaping
alg = SimpleImplicitTauLeaping()
sol = solve(jump_prob, alg; saveat=0.01)
plot(sol)
Screenshot from 2025-09-06 00-12-54
using JumpProcesses, DiffEqBase
using Test, LinearAlgebra
using StableRNGs, Plots
rng = StableRNG(12345)

# Reversible isomerization system from Cao et al. (2004)
function define_reversible_isomerization()
    c = (1000.0, 1000.0)
    reactant_stoich1 = [Pair(1, 1)]
    net_stoich1 = [Pair(1, -1), Pair(2, 1)]
    reactant_stoich2 = [Pair(2, 1)]
    net_stoich2 = [Pair(1, 1), Pair(2, -1)]
    jumps = MassActionJump([c[1], c[2]], [reactant_stoich1, reactant_stoich2], 
                          [net_stoich1, net_stoich2])
    return jumps
end

# Simulation parameters
u0 = [1000, 0]
tspan = (0.0, 0.1)
p = nothing
prob = DiscreteProblem(u0, tspan, p)
jump_prob = JumpProblem(prob, PureLeaping(), define_reversible_isomerization())

# Solve with both solvers
alg_newton = SimpleImplicitTauLeaping(epsilon=0.05, solver=NewtonImplicitSolver())
sol_newton = solve(jump_prob, alg_newton)
plot(sol_newton)

alg_trapezoidal = SimpleImplicitTauLeaping(epsilon=0.05, solver=TrapezoidalImplicitSolver())
sol_trapezoidal = solve(jump_prob, alg_trapezoidal)
plot(sol_trapezoidal)

NewtonImplicitSolver

Screenshot from 2025-09-06 00-14-04

TrapezoidalImplicitSolver

Screenshot from 2025-09-06 00-15-22

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan changed the title Kernels for ImplicitTauLeaping ImplicitTauLeaping solver and Kernels Jul 24, 2025
@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan changed the title ImplicitTauLeaping solver and Kernels ImplicitTauLeaping solver Aug 9, 2025
@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan changed the title ImplicitTauLeaping solver SimpleAdaptiveTauLeaping and SimpleImplicitTauLeaping Aug 9, 2025
@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan changed the title SimpleAdaptiveTauLeaping and SimpleImplicitTauLeaping SimpleImplicitTauLeaping solver Aug 14, 2025
@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan changed the title SimpleImplicitTauLeaping solver Draft: SimpleImplicitTauLeaping solver Aug 14, 2025
@sivasathyaseeelan sivasathyaseeelan changed the title Draft: SimpleImplicitTauLeaping solver SimpleImplicitTauLeaping solver Sep 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants