Feat/feedback #164
Feat/feedback #164
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughRecent updates significantly enhance user engagement by integrating feedback mechanisms into the application. New components facilitate the collection of reviews and ratings, while the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FeedbackComponent
participant AppState
User->>FeedbackComponent: Submit feedback
FeedbackComponent->>AppState: Update review and rating states
AppState->>FeedbackComponent: Confirm state update
FeedbackComponent->>User: Show submission status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.tsx (1)
47-163: Avoid inline styles for better performance.Inline styles can cause performance issues. Consider using CSS classes or styled components.
- <div className={styles.container}> - <Box className={styles.main}> - <Box> - <Typography - data-testid="feedback-title" - sx={{ - fontSize: '5vh', - fontWeight: 'bold', - color: theme?.primary?.main, - }} - > - Feedback - </Typography> - </Box> - ... - </Box> - </div> + <div className={styles.container}> + <Box className={styles.main}> + <Box> + <Typography data-testid="feedback-title" className={styles.feedbackTitle}> + Feedback + </Typography> + </Box> + ... + </Box> + </div>packages/pages/package.json (1)
39-43: LGTM! Dependency version changes enhance flexibility.The changes to version constraints for several
@samagra-xpackages enhance flexibility in dependency management. The specific version constraint for@samagra-x/xmessageensures compatibility with 1.x.x releases.Consider using a dependency management tool or strategy to monitor and manage potential compatibility issues with wildcard versions.
packages/molecules/package.json (1)
41-44: LGTM! Dependency version changes enhance flexibility.The changes to version constraints for several
@samagra-xpackages enhance flexibility in dependency management.Consider using a dependency management tool or strategy to monitor and manage potential compatibility issues with wildcard versions.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (9)
- apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (4 hunks)
- packages/config-manager/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/hooks/package.json (3 hunks)
- packages/molecules/package.json (2 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/pages/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/provider/package.json (3 hunks)
- turbo.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
turbo.json (1)
13-13: Disabling cache may impact development efficiency.Changing the "cache" property from
truetofalsecan lead to slower build times as resources will not be cached between builds. Ensure that this change is intentional and that the implications on the development workflow are understood.packages/molecules/src/index.ts (1)
12-12: LGTM! Ensure theFeedbackcomponent is correctly implemented.The addition of the
Feedbackcomponent to the exports enhances the module's functionality. Ensure that theFeedbackcomponent is correctly implemented and does not introduce any issues.Also applies to: 25-25
Verification successful
The
Feedbackcomponent is correctly implemented.The implementation of the
Feedbackcomponent includes all necessary properties and methods, handles feedback submission appropriately, and uses hooks for theming and configuration. No issues were found.
- The component includes properties like
showReviewBox,showRatingBox,handleFeedback, etc.- It uses hooks such as
useColorPalatesanduseUiConfig.- The feedback submission is handled with proper error handling and feedback to the user.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `Feedback` component. # Test: Search for the implementation of the `Feedback` component. Expect: Correct implementation without issues. rg --type ts -A 5 $'Feedback'Length of output: 31409
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `Feedback` component for detailed inspection. ast-grep --lang tsx --pattern $'const Feedback: React.FC<FeedbackProps> = ({ $$$ }) => { $$$ }' --debugLength of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `Feedback` component for detailed inspection. ast-grep --lang tsx --pattern $'const Feedback: React.FC<FeedbackProps> = ({ $$$ }) => { $$$ }' --debug-queryLength of output: 11262
packages/config-manager/package.json (1)
4-4: LGTM! Ensure the change does not introduce issues.Changing the
mainentry point fromdist/index.jsto./index.tsindicates a shift in the package's structure or build process. Ensure that the package will now leverage TypeScript features directly and that the change does not introduce any issues.Verification successful
Verification Complete: No Issues Found
The change to the
mainentry point to./index.tsis verified. The necessaryindex.tsfiles are present in the relevant packages, and the build process appears to be configured to handle TypeScript correctly.
packages/config-manager/index.tspackages/hooks/index.tspackages/provider/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changing the `main` entry point to `./index.ts`. # Test: Search for the usage of the `main` entry point. Expect: No issues with the new entry point. rg --type json -A 5 $'"main": "./index.ts"'Length of output: 1265
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence of tsup configuration in the repository rg --files-with-matches "tsup.config" --type json # Verify the existence of index.ts files in the relevant packages fd --type f "index.ts" packages/config-manager packages/provider packages/hooksLength of output: 510
packages/hooks/package.json (1)
4-4: Verify compatibility of the new main entry point.Changing the
mainfield to a TypeScript file may affect how the package is imported and utilized. Ensure that the consumers of this package are compatible with this change.packages/provider/package.json (2)
4-4: Verify compatibility of the new main entry point.Changing the
mainfield to a TypeScript file may affect how the package is imported and utilized. Ensure that the consumers of this package are compatible with this change.Verification successful
The new TypeScript main entry point is compatible.
The repository contains multiple
tsconfig.jsonfiles, indicating that the project is configured to handle TypeScript files. Therefore, changing themainfield to a TypeScript file should not cause any issues for the consumers of the@samagra-x/stencil-providerpackage.
apps/all-molecule-app/tsconfig.jsonapps/bot-app/tsconfig.jsonpackages/chatui/demo/tsconfig.jsonpackages/chatui/tsconfig.jsonpackages/config-manager/tsconfig.jsonpackages/hooks/tsconfig.jsonpackages/molecules/tsconfig.jsonpackages/pages/tsconfig.jsonpackages/provider/tsconfig.jsonpackages/ui/tsconfig.jsontsconfig.jsonScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the compatibility of the new main entry point. # Test: Search for the usage of the package. Expect: No issues with the new entry point. rg --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsx '@samagra-x/stencil-provider'Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the compatibility of the new main entry point. # Test: Search for the usage of the package. Expect: No issues with the new entry point. rg --type js --type ts '@samagra-x/stencil-provider'Length of output: 3710
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for TypeScript configuration files to ensure compatibility with the TypeScript entry point. # Search for TypeScript configuration files in the repository. fd --type f --name 'tsconfig.json'Length of output: 285
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for TypeScript configuration files to ensure compatibility with the TypeScript entry point. # Search for TypeScript configuration files in the repository. fd 'tsconfig.json'Length of output: 347
109-109: Verify the impact of removing export and type definition fields.The removal of the
exports,types, andmodulefields may affect module resolution and type checking. Ensure that the consumers of this package are compatible with these changes.apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (6)
2-6: LGTM! New imports are appropriate.The new imports for
useState,useCallback, andFeedbackare necessary for the added functionality.
20-21: LGTM! State variables are correctly initialized.The new state variables
reviewandratingare appropriately initialized usinguseState.
77-83: LGTM! Callback functions are correctly implemented.The new callback functions
handleReviewChangeandhandleRatingChangecorrectly update the state variables.
178-190: LGTM! Feedback component is correctly integrated.The new
Feedbackcomponent is appropriately integrated with the state variables and callback functions.
196-196: LGTM! Minor formatting change in export statement.The minor formatting change in the export statement does not affect functionality.
15-21: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
handleReviewChange,handleRatingChange, andhandleFeedbackmatch the new state management functionality.Also applies to: 77-88
Verification successful
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
handleReviewChange,handleRatingChange, andhandleFeedbackmatch the new state management functionality.
Verified the function usage in the codebase.
All function calls to
handleReviewChange,handleRatingChange, andhandleFeedbackmatch the new state management functionality.
apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx: Functions are defined and used consistently.packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.tsx: Related occurrences do not indicate inconsistencies.packages/pages/src/feedback/index.tsx: Related occurrences do not indicate inconsistencies.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `handleReviewChange`, `handleRatingChange`, and `handleFeedback` match the new state management functionality. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new state management functionality. rg --type tsx -A 5 $'handleReviewChange|handleRatingChange|handleFeedback'Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `handleReviewChange`, `handleRatingChange`, and `handleFeedback` match the new state management functionality. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new state management functionality. rg --type ts -A 5 'handleReviewChange|handleRatingChange|handleFeedback'Length of output: 5004
packages/molecules/package.json (1)
5-5: LGTM! Main entry point change is appropriate.The change from
lib/index.jsto./src/index.tssuggests a shift towards a more unified module structure, enhancing compatibility with TypeScript.
packages/hooks/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ | |||
| "dependencies": { | |||
| "react": "^18.2.0", | |||
| "react-dom": "^18.2.0", | |||
| "@samagra-x/stencil-provider": "0.0.7" | |||
| "@samagra-x/stencil-provider": "*" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential risk with wildcard dependency version.
Using a wildcard version for @samagra-x/stencil-provider can lead to compatibility issues if breaking changes are introduced in future versions. It is recommended to specify a more restrictive version range.
- "@samagra-x/stencil-provider": "*"
+ "@samagra-x/stencil-provider": "^0.0.7"Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "@samagra-x/stencil-provider": "*" | |
| "@samagra-x/stencil-provider": "^0.0.7" |
| const handleFeedback = async () => { | ||
| console.log('Feedback submitted:', { review, rating }); | ||
| // Handle feedback submission logic here | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Asynchronous function is correctly implemented.
The new asynchronous function handleFeedback correctly logs the feedback data. The comment indicates that the feedback submission logic is yet to be implemented.
Do you want me to generate the feedback submission logic or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/provider/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ | |||
| "@emotion/react": "^11.11.4", | |||
| "@emotion/styled": "^11.11.5", | |||
| "@mui/material": "^5.15.15", | |||
| "@samagra-x/stencil-config-manager": "0.0.7", | |||
| "@samagra-x/stencil-config-manager": "*", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential risk with wildcard dependency version.
Using a wildcard version for @samagra-x/stencil-config-manager can lead to compatibility issues if breaking changes are introduced in future versions. It is recommended to specify a more restrictive version range.
- "@samagra-x/stencil-config-manager": "*"
+ "@samagra-x/stencil-config-manager": "^0.0.7"Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "@samagra-x/stencil-config-manager": "*", | |
| "@samagra-x/stencil-config-manager": "^0.0.7", |
| const theme = useColorPalates(); | ||
| const config = useUiConfig('component', 'feedback'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize usage of hooks.
Consider memoizing the results of useColorPalates and useUiConfig to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
- const theme = useColorPalates();
- const config = useUiConfig('component', 'feedback');
+ const theme = React.useMemo(() => useColorPalates(), []);
+ const config = React.useMemo(() => useUiConfig('component', 'feedback'), []);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const theme = useColorPalates(); | |
| const config = useUiConfig('component', 'feedback'); | |
| const theme = React.useMemo(() => useColorPalates(), []); | |
| const config = React.useMemo(() => useUiConfig('component', 'feedback'), []); |
| const handleFeedbackClick = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| setFeedbackLoader(true); | ||
| await handleFeedback(); | ||
| setFeedbackLoader(false); | ||
| toast.success('Feedback submitted successfully'); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| setFeedbackLoader(false); | ||
| toast.error('Error while submitting feedback'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling in feedback submission.
Consider logging the error details for better debugging and user feedback.
- toast.error('Error while submitting feedback');
+ console.error('Feedback submission error:', error);
+ toast.error('Error while submitting feedback. Please try again later.');Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleFeedbackClick = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| setFeedbackLoader(true); | |
| await handleFeedback(); | |
| setFeedbackLoader(false); | |
| toast.success('Feedback submitted successfully'); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| setFeedbackLoader(false); | |
| toast.error('Error while submitting feedback'); | |
| } | |
| const handleFeedbackClick = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| setFeedbackLoader(true); | |
| await handleFeedback(); | |
| setFeedbackLoader(false); | |
| toast.success('Feedback submitted successfully'); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| setFeedbackLoader(false); | |
| console.error('Feedback submission error:', error); | |
| toast.error('Error while submitting feedback. Please try again later.'); | |
| } |
| type FeedbackProps = { | ||
| showReviewBox?: boolean; | ||
| showRatingBox?: boolean; | ||
| star?: number | null; | ||
| review?: string; | ||
| onChangeReview?: (newReview: string) => void; | ||
| onChangeRating?: (newRating: number | null) => void; | ||
| handleFeedback?: () => void; | ||
| styles?: object; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add prop types for better type checking.
Defining prop types ensures better type checking and improves the maintainability of the component.
- styles?: object;
+ styles?: React.CSSProperties;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type FeedbackProps = { | |
| showReviewBox?: boolean; | |
| showRatingBox?: boolean; | |
| star?: number | null; | |
| review?: string; | |
| onChangeReview?: (newReview: string) => void; | |
| onChangeRating?: (newRating: number | null) => void; | |
| handleFeedback?: () => void; | |
| styles?: object; | |
| }; | |
| type FeedbackProps = { | |
| showReviewBox?: boolean; | |
| showRatingBox?: boolean; | |
| star?: number | null; | |
| review?: string; | |
| onChangeReview?: (newReview: string) => void; | |
| onChangeRating?: (newRating: number | null) => void; | |
| handleFeedback?: () => void; | |
| styles?: React.CSSProperties; | |
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx (5 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/list/types.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx
[error] 51-51: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
[error] 100-107: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (7)
packages/molecules/src/list/types.ts (1)
22-22: Addition ofonDeleteproperty is well-integrated.The new
onDeleteproperty enhances theListTypeby allowing a callback mechanism for item deletion. Ensure that this property is utilized correctly in components using this type.packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx (2)
10-10: Addition ofonDeleteprop toListcomponent is well-integrated.The new
onDeleteprop enhances theListcomponent by allowing item deletion. Ensure that this prop is passed correctly when the component is used.
22-26:handleDeletefunction is correctly implemented.The
handleDeletefunction correctly checks if theonDeletecallback is provided and calls it with the item's ID.apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (4)
20-21: Addition ofreviewandratingstate variables is well-implemented.The new state variables
reviewandratingcorrectly manage the feedback data.
72-78: Callback functions for managing review and rating changes are correctly implemented.The
handleReviewChangeandhandleRatingChangefunctions correctly update the state variables.
80-83: LGTM! Asynchronous function is correctly implemented.The new asynchronous function
handleFeedbackcorrectly logs the feedback data. The comment indicates that the feedback submission logic is yet to be implemented.
176-184: Integration ofFeedbackcomponent is well-implemented.The
Feedbackcomponent is correctly rendered with props linked to the new state and handler functions.
| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <React.Fragment key={item.id}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary fragment.
The fragment wrapping the list item is unnecessary and can be removed.
- <React.Fragment key={item.id}>
+ <div key={item.id}>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <React.Fragment key={item.id}> | |
| <div key={item.id}> |
| {item.items && item.items.map((nestedItem) => ( | ||
| <ListItemButton key={nestedItem.id} sx={{ pl: 8 }}> | ||
| <ListItemIcon> | ||
| {nestedItem.icon ? React.cloneElement(nestedItem.icon) : <StarBorder />} | ||
| </ListItemIcon> | ||
| <ListItemText primary={nestedItem.label} /> | ||
| </ListItemButton> | ||
| ))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use optional chaining for nested items.
The nested items can be accessed using optional chaining to simplify the code.
- {item.items && item.items.map((nestedItem) => (
+ {item.items?.map((nestedItem) => (Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {item.items && item.items.map((nestedItem) => ( | |
| <ListItemButton key={nestedItem.id} sx={{ pl: 8 }}> | |
| <ListItemIcon> | |
| {nestedItem.icon ? React.cloneElement(nestedItem.icon) : <StarBorder />} | |
| </ListItemIcon> | |
| <ListItemText primary={nestedItem.label} /> | |
| </ListItemButton> | |
| ))} | |
| {item.items?.map((nestedItem) => ( | |
| <ListItemButton key={nestedItem.id} sx={{ pl: 8 }}> | |
| <ListItemIcon> | |
| {nestedItem.icon ? React.cloneElement(nestedItem.icon) : <StarBorder />} | |
| </ListItemIcon> | |
| <ListItemText primary={nestedItem.label} /> | |
| </ListItemButton> | |
| ))} |
Tools
Biome
[error] 100-107: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/all-molecule-app/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.module.css (1 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.module.css
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/molecules/src/feedback/index.tsx
Additional comments not posted (6)
apps/all-molecule-app/tsconfig.json (1)
16-16: LGTM! Inclusion of the new file for TypeScript compilation.The addition of
"app/molecules/page.tsx"to theincludesection ensures that the TypeScript compiler processes this file. This change is appropriate and improves type-checking and compilation capabilities.apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (5)
2-16: LGTM! Necessary imports for new functionality.The new imports, including
useCallback,useState, andFeedback, are necessary for the new functionality introduced in the file.
20-21: LGTM! Addition of state variables for feedback management.The new state variables
reviewandratingare necessary to manage the feedback data.
72-83: LGTM! Addition of handler functions for feedback management.The new handler functions
handleReviewChange,handleRatingChange, andhandleFeedbackare necessary to manage changes to the feedback data and log the feedback upon submission.
173-187: LGTM! Integration of the newFeedbackcomponent.The new
Feedbackcomponent is integrated correctly into the JSX structure, enhancing user interaction by allowing the collection of reviews and ratings.
192-192: LGTM! Minor formatting adjustment in the export statement.The minor formatting adjustment in the export statement does not affect the functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
10-32:
Ensure proper handling of newstylesprop.The
stylesprop is merged usingreducewith spread syntax, which can be inefficient for large arrays.- const mergedStyles = styles.reduce((acc, style) => ({ ...acc, ...style }), {}); + const mergedStyles = Object.assign({}, ...styles);This approach avoids the performance overhead of using spread syntax in a reduce function.
Tools
Biome
[error] 31-31: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx
[error] 31-31: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 54-54: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
[error] 103-110: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (12)
packages/molecules/src/list/index.tsx (6)
3-4: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The new imports are necessary for the added delete functionality and other list item features.
22-26: LGTM!handleDeletefunction is correctly implemented.The
handleDeletefunction checks if theonDeletecallback is provided and calls it with the item's ID.
51-51: Remove unnecessary fragment.The fragment wrapping the list item is unnecessary and can be removed.
- subheader={<>{label && <ListSubheader component="div">{label}</ListSubheader>}</>} + subheader={label && <ListSubheader component="div">{label}</ListSubheader>}
58-58: Remove unnecessary fragment.The fragment wrapping the list item is unnecessary and can be removed.
- <React.Fragment key={item.id}> + <div key={item.id}>
96-98: LGTM! Delete button is correctly implemented.The delete button is correctly added to each list item and triggers the
handleDeletefunction.
103-110: Use optional chaining for nested items.The nested items can be accessed using optional chaining to simplify the code.
- {item.items && item.items.map((nestedItem) => ( + {item.items?.map((nestedItem) => (Tools
Biome
[error] 103-110: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
apps/all-molecule-app/app/molecules/page.tsx (6)
2-15: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The new imports are necessary for the added feedback functionality and other features.
19-22: LGTM! State variables for review and rating are correctly implemented.The state variables
reviewandratingare initialized usinguseState.
73-79: LGTM! Handler functions for review and rating changes are correctly implemented.The
handleReviewChangeandhandleRatingChangefunctions update the respective state variables.
81-84: LGTM! Asynchronous function is correctly implemented.The new asynchronous function
handleFeedbackcorrectly logs the feedback data. The comment indicates that the feedback submission logic is yet to be implemented.Do you want me to generate the feedback submission logic or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
113-117: LGTM! List component integration is correct.The
Listcomponent is correctly integrated with theonDeletehandler.
177-190: LGTM! Feedback component integration is correct.The
Feedbackcomponent is correctly integrated with the state variables and handler functions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Feedbackcomponent for users to provide ratings and reviews.Listcomponent, allowing users to remove list items.Documentation
Feedbackcomponent available for import.