Skip to content

[issue #1] Document the legacy migration inventory#32

Merged
Saber5656 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-1-migration-inventory
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

[issue #1] Document the legacy migration inventory#32
Saber5656 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-1-migration-inventory

Conversation

@Saber5656

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • establish Saber5656/cage as the canonical public source and working repository
  • classify every legacy cage-demo area for staged migration or explicit exclusion
  • map migration candidates to their owning follow-up issues and review requirements
  • exclude scheduled workflow triggers, legacy Git history, build output, and sensitive machine-local artifacts

Validation

  • compared the inventory against all 52 legacy files outside .git/** and target/**
  • verified git diff --check
  • verified README is unchanged and the current repository has no scheduled workflow trigger
  • independent contents-quality-manager review: approved, no blocker or major findings
  • tech-security commit review: security_clear, no findings

Closes #1

Document the canonical repository, staged migration ownership, explicit exclusions, and workflow trigger policy for issue #1.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Saber5656, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 9 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0b6bd10e-dd27-495e-85be-952f58e5becc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 418d685 and 7fd59d4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • docs/migration/inventory.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/issue-1-migration-inventory

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Saber5656 Saber5656 self-assigned this Jul 12, 2026
@Saber5656 Saber5656 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 12, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 13bb7ca991

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/migration/inventory.md
Comment thread docs/migration/inventory.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/migration/inventory.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/migration/inventory.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/migration/inventory.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/migration/inventory.md Outdated
Make the canonical repository decision and staged migration scope discoverable from the repository root.
Correct the legacy workflow history and add every review owner identified by the approved PR feedback.
@Saber5656
Saber5656 merged commit 8c09dc2 into main Jul 14, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Phase 0] Canonicalize the Cage public repository and confirm migration scope from cage-demo

1 participant