Skip to content

Conversation

MahadMuhammad
Copy link
Contributor

Originally posted by @tschwinge in #3071 (comment)


gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* rust/external/README.md: information about external directory.
* rust/external/external.exp: New test.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would call the folder rustc instead of external

@MahadMuhammad MahadMuhammad force-pushed the test/external-directory branch from 7712869 to 4239efb Compare July 21, 2024 17:37
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* rust/rustc/README.md: information about
	rustc external directory.
	* rust/rustc/rustc.exp: New test.

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Mahad <[email protected]>
@MahadMuhammad MahadMuhammad force-pushed the test/external-directory branch from 4239efb to 94a4a10 Compare July 21, 2024 17:37
@MahadMuhammad MahadMuhammad marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2024 17:38
This repository contains test cases from the
[rustc test suite](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests). The
conversion of these tests into the DejaGnu format is done by the rustc
testsuite adaptor, a tool specifically designed for this purpose.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Later we'll need to mention where could people find this tool.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I'll open a new issue. So, that we won't forgot about this :)

@P-E-P P-E-P added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into Rust-GCC:master with commit 47c947c Jul 25, 2024
@MahadMuhammad MahadMuhammad deleted the test/external-directory branch July 25, 2024 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants