Ability to handle validation logic for users #10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
puentesarrin
changed the title
puentesarrin
changed the title
larslevie
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
331a377 to
ecdc99b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey!
It can be useful to reject access or unauthorize users under certain conditions, so if
GET_USERraises aGetUserExceptionexception, this module can return proper response too instead of giving access everyone by default.This changeset also introduces a
GET_USER_EXCEPTION_HANDLERwhich is useful to handle response for this kind of user validations.Hope that it's helpful for you too. Thanks!