test: branch coverage comment on PR #1035
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis update introduces code coverage instrumentation and reporting for the project. The build configuration is modified to integrate the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub as GitHub Actions
participant Runner as Workflow Runner
participant Repo as Repository
participant pnpm as pnpm
participant Node as Node.js
participant Test as Test Suite
participant Coverage as Coverage Reporter
GitHub->>Runner: Trigger workflow on PR to main/master/develop
Runner->>Repo: Checkout code
Runner->>pnpm: Install pnpm@8
Runner->>Node: Setup Node.js 18 with pnpm cache
Runner->>pnpm: Install dependencies
Runner->>Test: Run tests with coverage (pnpm test)
Test->>Coverage: Generate lcov.info
Runner->>Coverage: Post coverage report comment on PR
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying www-rds with
|
| Latest commit: |
e3c4898
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://6dcc46d8.www-rds.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://test-pr-coverage.www-rds.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/coverage.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)ember-cli-build.js(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)tests/test-helper.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/coverage.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
23-23: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/coverage.yml
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 5-5: too many spaces inside brackets
(brackets)
[error] 5-5: too many spaces inside brackets
(brackets)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
58-58: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
58-58: Multiple top-level headings in the same document
null
(MD025, single-title, single-h1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: build (18.x)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (4)
package.json (1)
69-69: Good addition of code coverage dependency!The introduction of
ember-cli-code-coveragewill enable measuring test coverage, which is a valuable addition to the project's development toolchain.tests/test-helper.js (2)
8-11: Good implementation of code coverage importsCorrect imports from the ember-cli-code-coverage test support module to enable coverage reporting.
18-21: Well-implemented coverage reporting hookThe async QUnit.done callback correctly implements the coverage data collection pattern by:
- Forcing all modules to be loaded
- Awaiting the coverage data submission
This ensures accurate coverage data is collected after all tests complete.
ember-cli-build.js (1)
15-21: Well-configured Babel integration for code coverageThe Babel configuration correctly integrates code coverage instrumentation with the Embroider build system. The
embroider: trueoption is essential for compatibility with the project's build pipeline.
| - [ember inspector for chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ember-inspector/bmdblncegkenkacieihfhpjfppoconhi) | ||
| - [ember inspector for firefox](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ember-inspector/) | ||
|
|
||
| # testing commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove testing commit message from README
This appears to be a temporary testing note that should not be committed to the final version. Additionally, it creates a second top-level heading and has trailing spaces, both of which are Markdown lint issues.
-# testing commit 📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # testing commit |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
58-58: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
58-58: Multiple top-level headings in the same document
null
(MD025, single-title, single-h1)
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: [ main, master, develop ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix YAML list formatting to comply with lint rules
The branches: [ main, master, develop ] syntax triggers YAML lint errors due to extra spaces inside the brackets. Updating it to [main, master, develop] will resolve the issue.
- branches: [ main, master, develop ]
+ branches: [main, master, develop]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| branches: [ main, master, develop ] | |
| branches: [main, master, develop] |
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 5-5: too many spaces inside brackets
(brackets)
[error] 5-5: too many spaces inside brackets
(brackets)
| run: pnpm install | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Run tests with coverage | ||
| run: pnpm run test:coverage || true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use continue-on-error instead of shell fallback
Relying on || true hides any unexpected failures in the test step. It’s more idiomatic (and clearer) to use the built‑in continue-on-error option for this step.
- - name: Run tests with coverage
- run: pnpm run test:coverage || true
+ - name: Run tests with coverage
+ continue-on-error: true
+ run: pnpm run test:coverage📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| run: pnpm run test:coverage || true | |
| - name: Run tests with coverage | |
| continue-on-error: true | |
| run: pnpm run test:coverage |
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: [ main, master, develop ] | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add manual trigger with workflow_dispatch
Consider adding a workflow_dispatch entry so maintainers can run the coverage job on demand (e.g., for debugging or back‑filling coverage).
on:
pull_request:
branches: [main, master, develop]
+ workflow_dispatch:📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| on: | |
| pull_request: | |
| branches: [ main, master, develop ] | |
| on: | |
| pull_request: | |
| branches: [main, master, develop] | |
| workflow_dispatch: |
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 5-5: too many spaces inside brackets
(brackets)
[error] 5-5: too many spaces inside brackets
(brackets)
tejaskh3
force-pushed
the
test-PR-coverage
branch
from
74508b1 to
4aa58ad
Compare
Note ❌