Skip to content

FOUR-19940 - Do not filter by user for self-serve Processes I Manager #7910

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: release-2025-spring
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nolanpro
Copy link
Contributor

@nolanpro nolanpro commented Jan 16, 2025

Issue & Reproduction Steps

The self-serve value alias was forcing filtering by the current logged in user

Solution

  • Check for the parameter and skip the user when showing processes I Manage

How to Test

See jira ticket

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:package-savedsearch:bugfix/FOUR-19940

@nolanpro nolanpro changed the title Do not filter by user for self-serve Processes I Manager FOUR-19940 - Do not filter by user for self-serve Processes I Manager Jan 16, 2025
@nolanpro nolanpro requested a review from gproly January 16, 2025 20:17
Copy link
Contributor

@gproly gproly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@nolanpro nolanpro changed the base branch from release-2025-winter to release-2025-spring April 2, 2025 17:57
@ryancooley ryancooley added the failing Has failing tests label Apr 4, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@nolanpro nolanpro removed the failing Has failing tests label Apr 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants