Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/vnf skeleton #5
Feature/vnf skeleton #5
Changes from all commits
bcade21
c8128be
90b798a
3c1b5c3
d676768
c37a689
d6a488f
048ca8a
f7fc794
153c6b1
c220cd4
cb68985
fbe07e6
da9af31
3167f8c
4c1d97c
c761e6d
a1e01d9
05b4c0e
f2d07e2
e335f4b
39a802f
7be16ef
e132c93
62dd06d
358b2a4
cb8d9bb
0fd2a70
4d8fe43
46961e5
213fb5a
13fa19f
8ba177a
27b4ce6
78263c6
c7b6a49
bd52369
d889789
5c644aa
102693e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not trying to revert this PR, but do you need to find these again? since the PGM core already hard-depends on this, you already have this from that location. Even more so, you're now actually overwriting the
Eigen3_FOUND
,Boost_FOUND
andnlohmann_json_FOUND
variables (and everything related). I think this is both redundant and actually more error-prone.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a particular reason why you went with out-of-line implementations instead of in-class implementations (as we do in the PGM):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am unsure if this is the way to go, because maybe later it can be forgotten and once implementation is ready some tests missed altogether. Just food for thought.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a temporary exclusion as the details are not implemented in the skeleton. The exclusions will be removed later on as the code are covered.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a todo here as well:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I forgot to unresolve this thread when commenting. Please don't forget to add one as well in the future PR's.