Enabling analytical diagnosis of targets and improve calibration dashboard

[juaristi22]

Fix #63
Fix #69
Fix #70

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
microcalibrate	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jul 21, 2025 3:57pm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (5b39b2f) to head (20a56c8).
Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/microcalibrate/calibration.py	0.00%	32 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #68   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files          8       8           
  Lines        202     296   +94     
=====================================
- Misses       202     296   +94     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nikhilwoodruff]

Approved on the non-analytical analysis parts but will leave @baogorek to review those.

[baogorek]

I could chat about design over a cup of coffee (for instance, should this be a separate utility or a method of Calibrate?), but really I'm interested in seeing 2 changes:

1. Please return a data frame from the analytical method function
2. In your test, use that data frame make sure that the loss is always zero. (Extra credit: use a harder target and ensure that it is not zero).

[baogorek]

Approving after trying out the most recent changes in my test environment.