vfs: Introduce a new cache warmer. - #504
Open
mathieu-plak wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
* It's too brittle, and breaks on bigger hierarchies.
* This one uses GetBlobs, and is deterministic in its order as opposed to the Prefetcher.
mathieu-plak
force-pushed
the
mm/vfs_cache_warmingup
branch
from
July 24, 2026 14:34
c4c2192 to
495121f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This gets rid of the existing VFS cache prefetcher, because it falls down on bigger hierarchies, and switch to a deterministic VFS cache warmer.
The design is quite simple, we just introduce a new step in the backup pipeline that groups parents dir, and warms the VFS cache. This warming happens using GetBlobs and so is super efficient (hence the need to group!).
This turns a second backup (no changes) on the linux kernel on an AWS store from 3min to 18s.
ps: Still a draft because I'm not a huge fan of the PR history and I need some fixups. But it can already be looked at and used!