Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(apps/prod/tekton/configs/triggers): update trigger for more repos #1405

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator

add more repos to make the PRs on them to be added ok-to-test label automatically for given contributors.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from purelind January 14, 2025 07:28
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added area/apps env/prod will deploy on the main product cluster labels Jan 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2025

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title, description, and diff, it seems that the changes being made are to update the trigger for adding the ok-to-test label automatically for given contributors on more repos. The changes include adding more repositories to the list of those that trigger the action, as well as adding more contributors.

Overall, the changes seem reasonable and straightforward. However, there are a few potential issues that should be addressed before merging the pull request:

  1. The formatting of the list of repositories and contributors could be improved for readability. It might be helpful to align the items in the list or use a bullet point format.

  2. It is unclear why these specific repositories and contributors were chosen. It might be helpful to add some context to the pull request description to explain the reasoning behind these choices.

  3. It is possible that there are other repositories or contributors that should be included in the trigger. It might be worth considering if there are any other relevant contributors or repositories that should be added to the list.

To address these issues, I would suggest the following:

  1. Improve the formatting of the list of repositories and contributors to make it more readable and easier to understand.

  2. Add some context to the pull request description to explain why these specific repositories and contributors were chosen.

  3. Consider if there are any other relevant repositories or contributors that should be added to the list and update the pull request accordingly.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/S label Jan 14, 2025
@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jan 14, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit f9e5b88 into main Jan 14, 2025
4 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the chore/add-more-members-to-special-ok-to-test-list branch January 14, 2025 07:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved area/apps env/prod will deploy on the main product cluster size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant