-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
[Bug Fix] Higher order Trotter product for CDF Hamiltonian #1354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Hey, looks like you've updated some demos! 🐘 Don't forget to update the Please hide this comment once the field(s) are updated. Thanks! |
Thank you for opening this pull request. You can find the built site at this link. Deployment Info:
Note: It may take several minutes for updates to this pull request to be reflected on the deployed site. |
demonstrations/tutorial_how_to_build_compressed_double_factorized_hamiltonians.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…zed_hamiltonians.py
demonstrations/tutorial_how_to_build_compressed_double_factorized_hamiltonians.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @obliviateandsurrender for fixing this. How do you make sure the current version is bug free and the final results are correct?
@soranjh I have separately tested this for other molecules for larger time scales as well, and cross-checked the circuit structure obtained here by manually creating a compatible CDF-based Trotter routine. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @obliviateandsurrender.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The preview looks good.
Fixes the higher order Trotter product for CDF Hamiltonian demo.
[sc-88945]