Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor CSS src/components/EventRegistrantsModal #3383

Merged

Conversation

prathmesh703
Copy link
Contributor

@prathmesh703 prathmesh703 commented Jan 22, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Refactor CSS

Issue Number:

Fixes #3335

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
NO

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information
moved all css of this file into app.module.css

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Styling Changes

    • Updated loader styles with new CSS variables for more flexible color customization.
    • Migrated loader styles from a specific component module to the global application stylesheet.
    • Simplified and centralized loader styling approach.
  • Refactor

    • Removed component-specific CSS module.
    • Updated import references for styling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring CSS files for the EventRegistrantsModal component by consolidating styles into the global app.module.css file. The changes involve removing the specific EventRegistrantsModal.module.css file and updating the import statement in the corresponding TypeScript component to use the global CSS file. New CSS variables for loader styling have been introduced to enhance customization and maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css Deleted entirely
src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx Updated import from local CSS module to global app.module.css
src/style/app.module.css Added new CSS variables --loader-border and --loader-border-left, updated loader styles

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Streamline CSS into single global file [#3335]
Delete CSS files in component subdirectory [#3335]
Use descriptive variable names [#3335]
Reference only global CSS file [#3335]

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • rishav-jha-mech

Poem

🐰 CSS dancing, styles so neat
Modules merge in a rhythmic beat
Global file shines, colors align
Refactoring magic, simply divine!
A rabbit's code, clean and bright 🎨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb2366d and 4f28154.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

3620-3629: Consider consolidating keyframe definitions to reduce duplication.

While the implementation is correct, there's duplicate code between the standard and webkit-prefixed keyframes. Consider using a preprocessor like SASS/SCSS to generate vendor prefixes automatically, reducing maintenance overhead.

Example using SASS:

@keyframes load8 {
  0% {
    transform: rotate(0deg);
  }
  100% {
    transform: rotate(360deg);
  }
}

// Let SASS handle vendor prefixes
@-webkit-keyframes load8 {
  @extend load8;
}

Also applies to: 3640-3640

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9fdea1 and eb2366d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

129-130: LGTM! Well-structured CSS variables for loader styling.

The new variables --loader-border and --loader-border-left are appropriately named and maintain consistency with the existing color scheme.


3610-3613: LGTM! Clean implementation of loader border styles.

The loader border styles are well-implemented using the new CSS variables, maintaining consistent border width.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.67%. Comparing base (f9fdea1) to head (4f28154).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ts/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3383       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              7.93%   89.67%   +81.74%     
=====================================================
  Files                   312      335       +23     
  Lines                  8129     8640      +511     
  Branches               1815     1921      +106     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    645     7748     +7103     
+ Misses                 7417      633     -6784     
- Partials                 67      259      +192     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 89.67% <0.00%> (?)
jest 7.93% <0.00%> (?)
vitest 89.67% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants