-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 826
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor CSS src/components/EventRegistrantsModal #3383
refactor CSS src/components/EventRegistrantsModal #3383
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring CSS files for the EventRegistrantsModal component by consolidating styles into the global Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
3620-3629
: Consider consolidating keyframe definitions to reduce duplication.While the implementation is correct, there's duplicate code between the standard and webkit-prefixed keyframes. Consider using a preprocessor like SASS/SCSS to generate vendor prefixes automatically, reducing maintenance overhead.
Example using SASS:
@keyframes load8 { 0% { transform: rotate(0deg); } 100% { transform: rotate(360deg); } } // Let SASS handle vendor prefixes @-webkit-keyframes load8 { @extend load8; }Also applies to: 3640-3640
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css
(0 hunks)src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx
(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css
(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/EventRegistrantsModal/EventRegistrantsModal.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
129-130
: LGTM! Well-structured CSS variables for loader styling.The new variables
--loader-border
and--loader-border-left
are appropriately named and maintain consistency with the existing color scheme.
3610-3613
: LGTM! Clean implementation of loader border styles.The loader border styles are well-implemented using the new CSS variables, maintaining consistent border width.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3383 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 7.93% 89.67% +81.74%
=====================================================
Files 312 335 +23
Lines 8129 8640 +511
Branches 1815 1921 +106
=====================================================
+ Hits 645 7748 +7103
+ Misses 7417 633 -6784
- Partials 67 259 +192
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
b99eba7
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactor CSS
Issue Number:
Fixes #3335
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
NO
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
moved all css of this file into app.module.css
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Styling Changes
Refactor