Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#3174 Action Item Pages Violate The Figma Style Guide #3372

Conversation

pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor

@pranavnathe pranavnathe commented Jan 21, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR updates the styling of the Action Items page to align with the Figma design specifications.

Issue Number:

Fixes #3174

Snapshots/Videos:

Action.Items.mp4

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

This PR resolves issues related to the design mismatch and ensures the page adheres to the design guidelines.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Style Updates

    • Updated primary theme color to use a dynamic value from CSS variables.
    • Introduced new .closeButton class for consistent modal button styling.
    • Added CSS variables for improved flexibility in button and checkbox styling.
    • Shifted DataGrid styling from inline to CSS module-based styling.
    • Enhanced hover and focus styles for buttons and checkboxes, including drop shadow effects.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Added robust error handling for root container initialization.
    • Corrected invalid background color values in UI components.
  • Chores

    • Standardized close button class names across modals.
    • Adjusted test case timing expectations for response delays.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces updates to theme color configuration and error handling improvements in various components. The primary color is now dynamically retrieved from CSS variables instead of being hardcoded. Additionally, a check for the presence of the root container in the DOM has been added to prevent runtime errors. Styling changes include class name updates for buttons and a shift from inline styles to CSS module-based styling for the DataGrid. Enhancements to CSS variables for shadow effects and new button styles are also implemented.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/index.tsx Updated theme color from #31bb6b to a dynamic value using CSS variables and added a check for the root container.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.tsx, src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx Changed close button class from styles.modalCloseBtn to styles.closeButton.
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx Removed inline background color styling for DataGrid and added className prop for CSS module styling.
src/style/app.module.css Introduced new CSS variables, added .closeButton class, and updated shadow usage for dropdown and input fields.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Consolidate CSS into src/style/app.module.css
Use variable names describing color function
Remove HTML color codes except in app.module.css
Conform to Figma style guide
Standardize modal design

Possibly related issues

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In a world of colors, bright and new,
A rabbit hops, with a design crew.
Shadows dance and buttons gleam,
Figma's style, our guiding dream.
With CSS magic, we craft with delight! 🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

487-489: Remove commented code.

The commented out margin-left should be removed to keep the code clean.

.createButton {
  background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important;
  color: var(--black-color) !important;
  margin-top: 10px;
-  /* margin-left: 5px; */
  border: 1px solid var(--brown-color);
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7d28d5 and 7f816bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.tsx
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/index.tsx (2)

41-41: LGTM! Color update aligns with Figma style guide.

The primary color change from #31bb6b to #1778F2 matches the design specifications.


142-144: LGTM! Good error handling for root container.

The added check prevents potential runtime errors by validating the root container's existence before mounting the React application.

src/style/app.module.css (3)

165-165: LGTM! Good use of CSS variable for consistent shadows.

The introduction of --drop-shadow variable centralizes shadow styling and improves maintainability.


337-341: LGTM! Clean implementation of close button styles.

The close button styles are well-organized and use CSS variables for colors, maintaining consistency with the design system.


363-363: LGTM! Consistent use of drop shadow variable.

The box shadow styles consistently use the new --drop-shadow variable across different elements (dropdown, button hover, input focus), maintaining visual consistency.

Also applies to: 496-496, 519-519

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.67%. Comparing base (846ce57) to head (19a3dbe).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/index.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3372       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              7.92%   89.67%   +81.74%     
=====================================================
  Files                   312      335       +23     
  Lines                  8135     8642      +507     
  Branches               1817     1922      +105     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    645     7750     +7105     
+ Misses                 7423      631     -6792     
- Partials                 67      261      +194     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 89.67% <0.00%> (?)
jest 7.92% <ø> (?)
vitest 89.67% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. When you hover over the icons in the options column, the icons change color. There should only be a shadow.
  2. When you click on the icons, they turn green. There should be no color change.
  3. At the end of the video the unchecked box has a green border. There should be none

src/index.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The delete trash can icon is smaller than the other blue ones in the options column. It must be the same size

@pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor Author

The delete trash can icon is smaller than the other blue ones in the options column. It must be the same size

Action Items icon size fix Fixed the icon size.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

337-341: Consider using existing color variables for consistency.

The .closeButton class uses the raw variable --remove-button-color directly. For better maintainability and consistency with the codebase's color system, consider using semantic color variables.

.closeButton {
-  color: var(--remove-button-color);
+  color: var(--delete-button-color);
  border: none;
-  background-color: var(--white-color);
+  background-color: var(--bs-white);
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f816bc and c4fe5c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

165-165: Good addition of a reusable shadow variable.

The addition of --drop-shadow as a CSS variable promotes consistency and maintainability by centralizing the shadow definition.


363-365: Good use of the new shadow variable.

The .dropdown class now uses the centralized --drop-shadow variable, improving consistency with other shadow effects.


518-520: Good use of the new shadow variable and transition.

The .inputField:focus styles now use the centralized --drop-shadow variable and include a smooth transition effect for better UX.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

337-341: Consider adding hover and focus states to the .closeButton class.

While the base styling is good, interactive states would improve user experience and accessibility.

 .closeButton {
   color: var(--remove-button-color);
   border: none;
   background-color: var(--white-color);
+  transition: opacity 0.2s ease;
+ }
+
+ .closeButton:hover {
+  opacity: 0.8;
+ }
+
+ .closeButton:focus {
+  outline: 2px solid var(--remove-button-color);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
 }

641-643: Consider adding responsive border-radius for .dataGridContainer.

The current fixed border-radius might look too large on smaller screens.

 .dataGridContainer {
-  border-radius: 20px;
+  border-radius: clamp(12px, 2vw, 20px);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4fe5c2 and 855dd78.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
  • src/index.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

165-165: Good addition of the --drop-shadow CSS variable!

Centralizing the shadow value as a CSS variable promotes consistency and makes it easier to maintain shadow effects across the application.


363-365: Good implementation of the new shadow variable!

The consistent use of var(--drop-shadow) across different components improves visual consistency and maintainability.

Also applies to: 486-495, 518-521

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2025
@pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. When you hover over the icons in the options column, the icons change color. There should only be a shadow.
  2. When you click on the icons, they turn green. There should be no color change.
  3. At the end of the video the unchecked box has a green border. There should be none
Action.Items.fixes.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

479-484: Consider adding transition for smoother hover effect.

The actionItemDeleteButton styles are good, but could benefit from a smooth transition.

 .actionItemDeleteButton {
   background-color: var(--delete-button-bg) !important;
   color: var(--delete-button-color) !important;
+  transition: box-shadow 0.2s ease-in-out;
 }

645-647: Add overflow handling for dataGridContainer.

The dataGridContainer should handle overflow gracefully to prevent content from breaking the layout.

 .dataGridContainer {
   border-radius: 20px;
+  overflow: hidden;
 }

2047-2054: Enhance focus styles for better accessibility.

While the hover and focus styles are good, consider adding a visible focus outline for better keyboard navigation.

 .checkboxButton input:focus {
   outline: none;
   box-shadow: none;
+  outline: 2px solid var(--bs-primary);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 855dd78 and 130e371.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (9 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

165-165: Good addition of a reusable shadow variable!

The --drop-shadow CSS variable promotes consistency across the application and makes shadow maintenance easier.


337-341: LGTM: Clean implementation of closeButton styles.

The styles follow the Figma guide with appropriate color variables and clear structure.

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/index.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Action.Items.fixes.mov

Fixed the checkbox green outline and removed the cell border

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing test and conflicting file

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

97-104: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use semantic variable names for colors.

The new CSS variables should use semantic names that describe their function rather than their color. This helps with future dark mode support.

-  --info-button-bg: var(--light-blue);
-  --info-button-border: var(--brown-color);
-  --info-button-text: var(--brown-color);
+  --info-button-bg: var(--primary-action-bg);
+  --info-button-border: var(--primary-border-color);
+  --info-button-text: var(--primary-text-color);
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

533-538: Avoid using !important declarations.

The !important declarations on the action item delete button should be avoided as they make styles harder to maintain and override.

.actionItemDeleteButton {
-  background-color: var(--delete-button-bg) !important;
-  color: var(--delete-button-color) !important;
+  background-color: var(--delete-button-bg);
+  color: var(--delete-button-color);
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2ae87a and 40efc9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/style/app.module.css (11 hunks)
  • src/utils/StaticMockLink.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/utils/StaticMockLink.spec.ts (1)

717-717: Verify the timing change rationale.

The minimum expected delay time has been reduced from 50ms to 40ms. Please confirm if this change is due to:

  1. Addressing flaky tests that were failing intermittently with the 50ms threshold
  2. Matching changes in the actual implementation's timing behavior
✅ Verification successful

Confirmed: Test reliability improvement

The change from 50ms to 40ms threshold makes the test more reliable while still validating the 50ms delay configuration. This provides a 10ms buffer to prevent flaky test failures due to timing precision issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for delay-related configurations in the codebase
echo "Searching for delay configurations..."
rg -A 5 "delay.*=.*[45]0" --type ts

Length of output: 122


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the test context and related delay configurations
echo "Searching for the test context..."
rg -B 10 -A 2 "expect\(elapsed\)\.toBeGreaterThanOrEqual" src/utils/StaticMockLink.spec.ts

echo -e "\nSearching for delay-related configurations in StaticMockLink files..."
rg "delay|timeout|wait" src/utils/StaticMockLink*

echo -e "\nSearching for timing constants..."
rg "const.*=.*\d+.*ms" src/utils/StaticMockLink*

Length of output: 1494

src/style/app.module.css (2)

574-578: LGTM! Input field focus styles follow best practices.

The input field focus styles properly handle accessibility by providing clear visual feedback.


2093-2104: LGTM! Checkbox styles follow design guidelines.

The checkbox styles align with the Figma design guide, providing consistent visual feedback for hover and focus states.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/style/app.module.css (4)

416-418: Avoid using !important flags in CSS.

The !important flags make styles harder to maintain and override. Consider using more specific selectors instead.

-  box-shadow: var(--drop-shadow);
-  border: 1px solid var(--brown-color) !important;
-  color: var(--dropdown-color) !important;
+  .dropdown:is(:hover, :focus, :active, :focus-visible, .show, :disabled, :checked) {
+    box-shadow: var(--drop-shadow);
+    border: 1px solid var(--brown-color);
+    color: var(--dropdown-color);
+  }

533-538: Remove !important flags from action item delete button.

The !important flags should be avoided. Use more specific selectors to achieve the same effect.

-.actionItemDeleteButton {
-  background-color: var(--delete-button-bg) !important;
-  color: var(--delete-button-color) !important;
-}
+button.actionItemDeleteButton {
+  background-color: var(--delete-button-bg);
+  color: var(--delete-button-color);
+}

671-673: Remove !important flags from info button.

The !important flags should be avoided. Use more specific selectors to achieve the same effect.

-  background-color: var(--info-button-bg) !important;
-  border-color: var(--info-button-border) !important;
+button.infoButton {
+  background-color: var(--info-button-bg);
+  border-color: var(--info-button-border);
+}

Also applies to: 679-680


700-703: Remove !important flag from row background.

The !important flag should be avoided. Use more specific selectors to achieve the same effect.

-  background-color: var(--row-background) !important;
+tr.rowBackground {
+  background-color: var(--row-background);
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40efc9f and 98c8b44.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (10 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/style/app.module.css (6)

95-102: Improve semantic naming of CSS variables.

Some variables reference color names (e.g., --brown-color) instead of their functional purpose. This makes it harder to maintain a consistent theme and implement features like dark mode.

Consider renaming variables to describe their function rather than their color:

-  --info-button-bg: var(--light-blue);
-  --info-button-border: var(--brown-color);
-  --info-button-text: var(--brown-color);
+  --info-button-bg: var(--secondary-action-bg);
+  --info-button-border: var(--border-default);
+  --info-button-text: var(--text-default);

Line range hint 164-215: LGTM! Well-structured CSS variables.

The variables use semantic naming and consistent units, making them maintainable and reusable across the application.


387-391: LGTM! Clean button implementation.

The close button styles are well-structured, using CSS variables and following consistent naming conventions.


544-544: LGTM! Consistent button styling.

The create button styles use appropriate spacing and consistent shadow effects.

Also applies to: 552-553


574-578: LGTM! Well-structured input field styles.

The input field styles use appropriate transitions and consistent CSS variables.


2093-2104: LGTM! Accessible checkbox button styles.

The checkbox button styles follow accessibility best practices with appropriate focus states and use consistent CSS variables.

@pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 846ce57 and 98c8b44.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (10 hunks)
  • src/utils/StaticMockLink.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/index.tsx

[warning] 145-145: src/index.tsx#L145
Added line #L145 was not covered by tests


[warning] 147-147: src/index.tsx#L147
Added line #L147 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemDeleteModal.tsx (1)

65-65: LGTM! Style update aligns with Figma guide.

The class name change from modalCloseBtn to closeButton maintains functionality while improving style consistency.

src/index.tsx (2)

41-43: LGTM! Using CSS variables improves theme maintainability.

The change from hardcoded color to CSS variable aligns with the style guide and supports future dark mode implementation.


144-147: Add test coverage for root container error handling.

The new error handling for missing root container improves robustness but lacks test coverage.

Would you like me to help generate test cases for this error handling scenario?

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 145-145: src/index.tsx#L145
Added line #L145 was not covered by tests


[warning] 147-147: src/index.tsx#L147
Added line #L147 was not covered by tests

src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemViewModal.tsx (1)

60-60: LGTM! Consistent style update across modals.

The class name change maintains styling consistency with ItemDeleteModal component.

src/style/app.module.css (6)

95-102: LGTM! Good use of semantic color variables.

The new CSS variables follow best practices by using semantic names that describe their function rather than their color value, which will help with future theming support.


533-538: LGTM! Proper use of !important for delete button styles.

The use of !important is justified here to ensure consistent styling for critical delete actions.


544-544: LGTM! Consistent hover effects added.

Good addition of drop shadow on hover for better visual feedback.

Also applies to: 552-553


574-578: LGTM! Improved input field focus styles.

The focus styles provide clear visual feedback with a consistent shadow effect and smooth transition.


671-673: LGTM! Consistent info button styling.

The info button styles properly use CSS variables and maintain consistency with other buttons.

Also applies to: 679-680


2093-2104: LGTM! Enhanced checkbox styling with proper states.

Good implementation of hover and focus states for checkboxes using CSS variables.

@pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please fix the failing test and conflicting file

Resolved the failing test and fixed the conflicting file.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. You overwrote the changes to the existing CSS file.
    --brown-color no longer exists as well as other incorrectly labeled variables
  2. Please value the contributions of others in the collaborative approach of open source

@pranavnathe
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. You overwrote the changes to the existing CSS file.
    --brown-color no longer exists as well as other incorrectly labeled variables
  2. Please value the contributions of others in the collaborative approach of open source

Apologies for overwriting the changes. I appreciate everyone's efforts and will fix this ASAP. Thank you for pointing it out!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/style/app.module.css (5)

532-537: Consider alternatives to !important.

While the styles work, using !important is generally discouraged as it makes styles harder to maintain and override. Consider increasing specificity through class names or restructuring the CSS cascade.

-.actionItemDeleteButton {
-  background-color: var(--delete-button-bg) !important;
-  color: var(--delete-button-color) !important;
-}
+/* Increase specificity instead of using !important */
+.actionItems .actionItemDeleteButton,
+[data-theme="default"] .actionItemDeleteButton {
+  background-color: var(--delete-button-bg);
+  color: var(--delete-button-color);
+}

Line range hint 543-552: Remove commented out code.

Remove the commented out margin-left property as it adds noise to the codebase. If the property is needed in the future, it can be retrieved from version control.

.createButton {
  background-color: var(--grey-bg-color) !important;
  color: var(--black-color) !important;
  margin-top: 10px;
-  /* margin-left: 5px; */
  border: 1px solid var(--davys-grey);
}

573-577: Enhance input field focus styles.

The focus styles provide good user feedback with transitions, but consider:

  1. Avoiding !important by increasing selector specificity
  2. Adding outline-offset for better visibility
  3. Using outline-color instead of box-shadow for better accessibility
.inputField:focus {
-  border: 0.1px solid var(--input-field-border) !important;
-  background-color: var(--input-field-bg) !important;
-  box-shadow: var(--drop-shadow);
+  border: 0.1px solid var(--input-field-border);
+  background-color: var(--input-field-bg);
+  outline: 2px solid var(--input-field-border);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
  outline: none;
  transition: box-shadow 0.2s ease;
}

670-672: Improve info button styles.

The hover effects provide good user feedback, but consider:

  1. Avoiding !important by increasing selector specificity
  2. Adding focus styles for keyboard navigation
.infoButton {
-  background-color: var(--search-button-bg) !important;
+  background-color: var(--search-button-bg);
  border-color: var(--search-button-border);
-  color: var(--davys-grey) !important;
+  color: var(--davys-grey);
}

.infoButton:hover {
  background-color: var(--light-blue-color);
  border-color: var(--search-button-border);
-  color: var(--info-button-text) !important;
+  color: var(--info-button-text);
  box-shadow: var(--drop-shadow);
}

+.infoButton:focus-visible {
+  outline: 2px solid var(--info-button-text);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
+}

Also applies to: 680-681


701-701: Simplify row background style.

Consider removing the !important flag by increasing selector specificity or restructuring the CSS cascade.

-.rowBackground {
-  background-color: var(--row-background) !important;
-  max-height: 120px;
-  overflow-y: auto;
-}
+/* Increase specificity to avoid !important */
+.table .rowBackground,
+[data-theme="default"] .rowBackground {
+  background-color: var(--row-background);
+  max-height: 120px;
+  overflow-y: auto;
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98c8b44 and 19a3dbe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (10 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

95-100: Well-structured semantic CSS variables!

The new CSS variables follow good naming conventions by describing their function rather than their color value. This makes the code more maintainable and supports future theming changes.


2094-2105: Well-structured checkbox styles!

The checkbox styles are well-organized with:

  • Clear state management (checked, hover, focus)
  • Semantic CSS variables for colors
  • Good user feedback through visual changes
  • Proper focus handling for accessibility

@palisadoes palisadoes self-requested a review January 23, 2025 16:15
@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 07740e5 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 23, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants