Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #3343 Refactor: Moved Loader.module.css styles to app.module.css(single global file) and updated the import path #3353

Conversation

NischalPaliwal
Copy link

@NischalPaliwal NischalPaliwal commented Jan 19, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring

Issue Number:
Fixes #3343

Snapshots/Videos:
image

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No

Summary

  1. Added css from Loader.module.css to app.module.css
  2. Updated the import statement in src/components/Loader/Loader.tsx
  3. Deleted the Loader.module.css file

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information
This pull request is made in sequence of shifting individual css files to a single global css file.

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Relocated loader component styles from a dedicated module to the main application stylesheet
    • Consolidated spinner size classes into a single CSS module
  • Style

    • Maintained existing loader styling with consistent size variations (XL, Large, Small)
    • Preserved loader component's visual centering and layout properties

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS for the Loader component by moving its styles from a dedicated CSS module (Loader.module.css) to the global app.module.css file. The changes involve deleting the original CSS file, updating the import statement in the Loader.tsx component, and adding the loader-specific styles to the global stylesheet. This modification aligns with the project's goal of consolidating CSS files and improving UI/UX consistency.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/Loader/Loader.module.css Deleted CSS file containing spinner styles
src/components/Loader/Loader.tsx Updated CSS import from local module to app.module.css
src/style/app.module.css Added new CSS classes for loader: .spinner_wrapper, .spinnerXl, .spinnerLg, .spinnerSm

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Streamline CSS into single global file [#3343]
Delete CSS files in component subdirectory [#3343]
Use src/style/app.module.css as primary CSS file [#3343]

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • rishav-jha-mech

Poem

🐰 Loader styles, once scattered wide,
Now dance in app.module.css with pride!
Spinner classes, neat and clean,
A global stylesheet's serene dream!
Refactoring magic, code so bright! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c52f54e and 3dc6122.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/Loader/Loader.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/components/Loader/Loader.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/components/Loader/Loader.module.css
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (2)
  • src/components/Loader/Loader.tsx
  • src/style/app.module.css
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 8.40%. Comparing base (c52f54e) to head (3dc6122).
Report is 23 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres   #3353   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage              8.40%   8.40%           
================================================
  Files                   312     312           
  Lines                  8105    8105           
  Branches               1803    1803           
================================================
  Hits                    681     681           
  Misses                 7347    7347           
  Partials                 77      77           
Flag Coverage Δ
jest 8.40% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes changed the title Issue #3343 Refactor: Moved Loader.module.css styles to app.module.css(single global file) and updated the import path Fixes #3343 Refactor: Moved Loader.module.css styles to app.module.css(single global file) and updated the import path Jan 19, 2025
@NischalPaliwal
Copy link
Author

@palisadoes one check failed named "PR workflow/Test Application" because of below failed test ->
Screenshot 2025-01-22 123506
How can I proceed with this PR?

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Merge with the latest upstream

@NischalPaliwal
Copy link
Author

@palisadoes created a new PR that has passed all the checks so closing this one

@NischalPaliwal NischalPaliwal deleted the contribute_nischal branch January 26, 2025 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants