refactor useSession.spec.tsx to vitest #2979
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)📓 Common learnings🔇 Additional comments (4)src/utils/useSession.spec.tsx (4)
The shift from Jest to Vitest mocking API is correctly handled, and all mocks appear consistent with documented Vitest practices.
Using
Ensuring that all listeners (
The test name suggests verifying that updated community session timeouts (45 minutes) are applied, but it ultimately checks that neither warning nor session timeouts match the new durations (both booleans are Would you like to confirm that the code under test is not meant to adopt the new 45-minute timeout, or adjust the assertions to align with the new timeout logic? Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2979 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 38.68% 88.50% +49.81%
=====================================================
Files 299 320 +21
Lines 7427 8288 +861
Branches 1624 1813 +189
=====================================================
+ Hits 2873 7335 +4462
+ Misses 4337 731 -3606
- Partials 217 222 +5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Please update your local branch with the latest upstream. Push the update to your origin. The failing test should pass |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring from Jest to Vitest for the specified test file.
Issue Number
Fixes #2754
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes, all test cases were updated and verified to work with Vitest.
Snapshots/Videos
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not applicable, as this is a refactor of existing tests.
Summary
.test.tsxto.spec.tsx.npm run test:vitest.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, it is a refactor of existing test cases with no changes to the codebase logic.
Other Information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
useSessionhook, which eliminated all associated test coverage for session management functionality.