Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

convert test from jest to vitest #2838 #2856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024
Merged

convert test from jest to vitest #2838 #2856

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

khushipatil1523
Copy link
Contributor

@khushipatil1523 khushipatil1523 commented Dec 25, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will migrate the src/components/EventDashboardScreen/EventDashboardScreen.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2838

Issue Number:
Fixes #2838

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

Snapshots/Videos:
Screenshot 2024-12-25 135736

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Transitioned testing framework from Jest to Vitest.
    • Updated mocking methods to align with Vitest standards.
    • Adjusted test case syntax for consistency.
    • Enhanced type safety with explicit type annotations.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the EventDashboardScreen.spec.tsx test file from Jest to Vitest. The changes involve updating the testing framework-specific syntax, replacing Jest functions with their Vitest equivalents, and renaming the test file from .test.tsx to .spec.tsx. The modifications maintain the existing test structure and logic while ensuring compatibility with the Vitest testing framework.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/EventDashboardScreen/EventDashboardScreen.spec.tsx - Replaced Jest imports with Vitest imports
- Converted jest.fn() to vi.fn()
- Updated jest.mock() to vi.mock()
- Replaced test() with it()
- Added type annotation for mockID

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2838] ✅
Rename test file to .spec.* suffix [#2838] ✅
Ensure tests pass using npm run test:vitest [#2838] ❓ Requires actual test run verification
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2838] ❓ Requires coverage report verification

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, testing we go!
From Jest to Vitest, watch our code flow
Specs shining bright, tests running clean
A rabbit's delight, a testing dream! 🧪✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bc2d3b and 8447c9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/EventDashboardScreen/EventDashboardScreen.spec.tsx (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings 
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
src/components/EventDashboardScreen/EventDashboardScreen.spec.tsx (2) 
Learnt from: Doraemon012
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#1988
File: src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.test.tsx:282-282
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In the test 'Component should be rendered properly' within 'Testing LeftDrawerOrg component for SUPERADMIN', setting 'SuperAdmin' to false is intentional.

Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/components/EventDashboardScreen/EventDashboardScreen.spec.tsx (9)

2-2: Successful switch from Jest to Vitest.
This line correctly uses the Vitest imports and matches the PR objective of migrating from Jest.

14-14: LocalStorage usage appears correct.
No issues found with this new utility usage here.

19-27: Window matchMedia mock updated for Vitest.
This mock setup is valid in the Vitest environment and ensures tests can handle responsive logic.

32-32: (Empty line) No changes to review.

33-39: Correctly adapted to vi.mock from jest.mock.
Maintains the existing behavior while complying with Vitest’s mocking approach.

94-94: Accurate test block update to Vitest’s it syntax.
Continues to verify redirection logic for logged-out users with no disruptions.

109-109: Maintains consistent testing approach with it syntax.
Checks redirection paths for valid or invalid states.

123-123: No out-of-scope changes identified; Vitest usage looks good.
Verifies sidebar toggling logic remains intact under smaller/larger screen widths.

156-156: Properly checks for missing organization ID scenario.
The test ensures correct redirection, aligned with Vitest conversion.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.80%. Comparing base (1bc2d3b) to head (8447c9c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2856       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             65.12%   87.80%   +22.67%     
=====================================================
  Files                   296      313       +17     
  Lines                  7369     8222      +853     
  Branches               1609     1798      +189     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   4799     7219     +2420     
+ Misses                 2336      804     -1532     
+ Partials                234      199       -35

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit e719b82 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 25, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

@palisadoes palisadoes palisadoes approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@khushipatil1523 @palisadoes