Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Dropdown menu hidden under certain conditions #2763

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Shahmaz0
Copy link

@Shahmaz0 Shahmaz0 commented Dec 24, 2024

bugfix

In the Action Items section (Admin), the dropdown menu becomes hidden under other UI elements (table) under certain conditions. This behavior may be caused by issues related to z-index or parent container overflow.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2719

Did you add tests for your changes?

Not Needed

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A

Summary

This PR refactors the tailwind CSS for the OrganisationActionItems screen in which it fixes a dropdown overflow issue by changing the tailwind CSS file ensuring proper visibility and functionality of dropdown menus.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

N/A

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • No new features introduced.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated the dropdown container's overflow behavior for improved visibility in the Organization Action Items section.
  • Chores

    • Updated the vitest dependency version for development tools.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves two primary changes: updating the Vitest dependency version in package.json from ^2.1.5 to ^2.1.8, and modifying the CSS class in OrganizationActionItems.tsx from overflow-y-auto to overflow-visible. The Vitest version update is part of an ongoing migration from Jest to Vitest across various test suites, while the CSS change appears to address dropdown visibility issues in the Action Items section.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated Vitest dev dependency from ^2.1.5 to ^2.1.8
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx Changed div class from overflow-y-auto to overflow-visible

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Dropdown menu visibility [#2719]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • varshith257
  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Vitest updated with pure delight,
Dropdowns now dance without a care,
Overflow vanquished with flair to spare,
Debugging magic, oh so light! 🔍✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec91a82 and 69b04e2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

158-160: LGTM! Verify test suite compatibility after Vitest update.

The minor version bump of Vitest (^2.1.5 to ^2.1.8) looks good and maintains backward compatibility. Since this is part of the Jest to Vitest migration, please ensure all tests pass after the update.

Run the following script to verify test suite compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

Vitest update is safe to proceed

The Vitest configuration and test files show no version-specific dependencies that would be affected by the minor version update from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8. The project has:

  • A standard Vitest configuration using common plugins and settings
  • Multiple test files already using Vitest
  • Both Jest and Vitest setups running in parallel, which reduces migration risks
  • No version-specific features in the test configurations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any test configuration files that might need updates
# and verify test script definitions

# Check for Vitest config files
fd -e config.ts -e config.js --exec grep -l "vitest"

# Check test scripts in package.json
jq '.scripts | with_entries(select(.key | contains("test")))' package.json

Length of output: 382


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check vitest config and test files for any version-specific configurations
cat vitest.config.ts
cat jest.config.js

# Look for test files using vitest
rg -l "from 'vitest'" 

Length of output: 4221


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your PR has too many unnecessary files that don’t relate to your issue.

Please exclude files package-lock.json and package.json

You can exclude them from the PR by running the commands below from the root directory of the repository

git add -u
git reset HEAD path/to/file
git commit

Please apply these changes to this file(s).

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants