-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 796
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Dropdown menu hidden under certain conditions #2763
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves two primary changes: updating the Vitest dependency version in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)package.json (1)
The minor version bump of Vitest (^2.1.5 to ^2.1.8) looks good and maintains backward compatibility. Since this is part of the Jest to Vitest migration, please ensure all tests pass after the update. Run the following script to verify test suite compatibility: ✅ Verification successfulVitest update is safe to proceed The Vitest configuration and test files show no version-specific dependencies that would be affected by the minor version update from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8. The project has:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any test configuration files that might need updates
# and verify test script definitions
# Check for Vitest config files
fd -e config.ts -e config.js --exec grep -l "vitest"
# Check test scripts in package.json
jq '.scripts | with_entries(select(.key | contains("test")))' package.json
Length of output: 382 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check vitest config and test files for any version-specific configurations
cat vitest.config.ts
cat jest.config.js
# Look for test files using vitest
rg -l "from 'vitest'"
Length of output: 4221 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your PR has too many unnecessary files that don’t relate to your issue.
Please exclude files package-lock.json
and package.json
You can exclude them from the PR by running the commands below from the root directory of the repository
git add -u
git reset HEAD path/to/file
git commit
Please apply these changes to this file(s).
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready. |
bugfix
In the Action Items section (Admin), the dropdown menu becomes hidden under other UI elements (table) under certain conditions. This behavior may be caused by issues related to z-index or parent container overflow.
Issue Number:
Fixes #2719
Did you add tests for your changes?
Not Needed
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
This PR refactors the tailwind CSS for the OrganisationActionItems screen in which it fixes a dropdown overflow issue by changing the tailwind CSS file ensuring proper visibility and functionality of dropdown menus.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
N/A
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
vitest
dependency version for development tools.