Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed #2505 :Refactor CSS Structure for EventVolunteers: Improved Maintainability and UI Consistency #2675

Conversation

gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor

@gurramkarthiknetha gurramkarthiknetha commented Dec 17, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Feature/Refactoring

Issue Number:

Fixes #2505

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No

Summary

This PR refactors the CSS structure for the EventVolunteers and its related components. The changes involve merging all CSS files from the subdirectory and related components into the global CSS file. After the merge, the old CSS files were deleted, and the components were updated to reference the global CSS. This improves maintainability and adheres to the updated design patterns.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, these changes only refactor the existing CSS structure.

Other information

Testing was completed to ensure no UI regressions. All screens were verified for consistency with the updated global CSS styles.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new CSS classes for enhanced UI components, including dropdowns, buttons, and modals.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and logging in the GroupModal component.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test cases for the OrganizationScreen component to utilize CSS module styles.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined styling import paths across various components.
    • Adjusted internal logic in the GroupModal for better clarity and maintainability.
    • Updated class names for consistency across multiple components.
  • Chores

    • Removed obsolete CSS file for Event Volunteers, affecting its visual presentation.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS files in the src/screens/EventVolunteers directory by consolidating styles into a single global CSS file (src/style/app.module.css). Multiple components have been updated to import styles from the new global file, and the EventVolunteers.module.css file has been completely removed. The changes involve updating import statements, adjusting class names, and ensuring consistent styling across the Event Volunteers-related components.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/EventVolunteers/EventVolunteers.module.css Completely removed
src/screens/EventVolunteers/*/Requests.tsx, VolunteerContainer.tsx, VolunteerGroups/*.tsx, Volunteers/*.tsx Updated import path to ../../../style/app.module.css
src/style/app.module.css Added new CSS classes for dropdowns, buttons, modals, and UI elements
src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx Updated test assertions to use styles object

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Merge CSS files into global CSS
Delete original CSS files
Reference global CSS file
Adhere to new CSS guidelines

Suggested Labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr, test

Suggested Reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • varshith257

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, hooray! CSS is here to stay!
Styles now united, no more delay
One file to rule them all, so bright and clean
A rabbit's dream of a styling scene!
Refactoring magic, watch it unfold! 🎨✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2d44b6 and 975b7a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/setupTests.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/setupTests.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerContainer.tsx (1)

Line range hint 18-18: Function name should follow React component naming convention

React components should use PascalCase naming convention. The function name should be VolunteerContainer instead of volunteerContainer.

Apply this diff:

-function volunteerContainer(): JSX.Element {
+function VolunteerContainer(): JSX.Element {

-export default volunteerContainer;
+export default VolunteerContainer;

Also applies to: 335-335

src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (1)

Line range hint 46-46: Function name should follow React component naming convention

React components should use PascalCase naming convention. The function name should be Requests instead of requests.

Apply this diff:

-function requests(): JSX.Element {
+function Requests(): JSX.Element {

-export default requests;
+export default Requests;

Also applies to: 337-337

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx (1)

313-313: Remove redundant class name

The className contains both styles.btnsContainer and btncon which appear to serve the same purpose.

-<div className={`${styles.btnsContainer} btncon gap-4 flex-wrap`}>
+<div className={`${styles.btnsContainer} gap-4 flex-wrap`}>
src/style/app.module.css (3)

616-622: Use CSS variables for color values

Consider using CSS variables for color values to maintain consistency and make theme changes easier.

#individualRadio,
#requestsRadio,
#groupsRadio,
.toggleBtn:hover {
-  color: #31bb6b !important;
+  color: var(--bs-primary) !important;
}

input[type='radio']:checked + label {
-  background-color: #31bb6a50 !important;
+  background-color: var(--bs-primary-light) !important;
}

Also applies to: 628-655


700-718: Standardize color values using CSS variables

Replace hardcoded colors with CSS variables for better maintainability and theme consistency.

.inputFields {
  margin-top: 10px;
  margin-bottom: 10px;
  background-color: white;
-  box-shadow: 0 1px 1px #31bb6b;
+  box-shadow: 0 1px 1px var(--bs-primary);
}

.dropdowns {
  background-color: white;
-  border: 1px solid #31bb6b;
+  border: 1px solid var(--bs-primary);
  position: relative;
  display: inline-block;
-  color: #31bb6b;
+  color: var(--bs-primary);
}

740-748: Use semantic color variables for status indicators

Consider using semantic color variables for status indicators to maintain consistency across the application.

.active {
-  background-color: #31bb6a50 !important;
+  background-color: var(--status-active-bg) !important;
}

.pending {
-  background-color: #ffd76950 !important;
-  color: #bb952bd0 !important;
-  border-color: #bb952bd0 !important;
+  background-color: var(--status-pending-bg) !important;
+  color: var(--status-pending-text) !important;
+  border-color: var(--status-pending-border) !important;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9723078 and d482f10.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/EventVolunteers.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (10 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerContainer.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupViewModal.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx (12 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerCreateModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerDeleteModal.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerViewModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx (12 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/EventVolunteers.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupDeleteModal.tsx
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerCreateModal.tsx
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerDeleteModal.tsx
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.tsx
  • src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupModal.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerContainer.tsx (1)

4-4: LGTM!

The CSS import path has been successfully updated to use the global CSS module.

src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/VolunteerViewModal.tsx (1)

3-3: LGTM!

The CSS changes are consistent:

  • Import path updated to use the global CSS module
  • Class names updated to match the new global CSS convention

Also applies to: 86-86, 93-93

src/screens/EventVolunteers/Requests/Requests.tsx (1)

16-16: LGTM!

The CSS changes are consistent throughout the file:

  • Import path updated to use the global CSS module
  • Class names updated to match the new global CSS convention
  • DataGrid styling properly maintained

Also applies to: 157-157, 170-170, 183-183, 190-190, 208-208, 222-222, 254-254, 263-263, 285-285, 319-319

src/screens/EventVolunteers/Volunteers/Volunteers.tsx (3)

23-23: LGTM: Style import updated correctly

The import path has been properly updated to reference the global CSS module, aligning with the CSS consolidation objectives.


182-182: LGTM: Consistent header styling applied

Header class names have been consistently updated across all DataGrid columns to use the new global style.

Also applies to: 222-222, 242-242, 260-260, 281-281


195-195: LGTM: Image styling properly updated

Image and avatar class names have been correctly updated to use the consolidated global styles while maintaining consistent sizing and appearance.

Also applies to: 203-203

src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroupViewModal.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-233: LGTM! Well-structured component with consistent styling changes

The component is well-documented, follows React/TypeScript best practices, and the CSS changes have been applied consistently. The modal implementation includes proper accessibility attributes and test coverage.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
package.json (1)

Version mismatch confirmed between dependencies and resolutions

The verification confirms a critical version mismatch:

  • Dependencies use React 18.x:
    • react: ^18.3.1
    • react-dom: ^18.3.1
    • @types/react: ^18.3.12
    • @types/react-dom: ^18.3.1
  • Resolutions force older versions:
    • @types/react: 17.0.2
    • @types/react-dom: 17.0.2

This mismatch between React 18 dependencies and React 17 type definitions in resolutions will cause TypeScript compilation issues and potential runtime problems. Update the resolutions to match the React 18 versions:

"resolutions": {
  "@types/react": "^18.3.12",
  "@types/react-dom": "^18.3.1"
}
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 164-167: Review React version in resolutions.

The resolutions specify React 17.0.2, but the project's dependencies list React 18.3.1. This version mismatch could lead to compatibility issues. Consider updating the resolutions to match the project's React version.

Let's check for potential version conflicts:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for React version conflicts

# List all React-related dependencies and their versions
npm ls react
npm ls @types/react
npm ls react-dom
npm ls @types/react-dom

Length of output: 290


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json content to verify the dependencies and resolutions
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies["react"], .dependencies["react-dom"], .devDependencies["@types/react"], .devDependencies["@types/react-dom"], .resolutions'

Length of output: 328

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d482f10 and 57fcb6f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • jest-preview.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

153-153: ⚠️ Potential issue

Reconsider downgrading jest-preview.

The downgrade from ^0.3.1 to ^0.2.3 could potentially introduce compatibility issues with the CSS testing infrastructure. Consider maintaining the newer version unless there's a specific reason for the downgrade.

Let's check the changelog for breaking changes:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the usage of jest-preview in the codebase to understand the potential impact.


Let me check the actual usage of jest-preview in the test files to understand how it's being used.


Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:

The jest-preview downgrade is safe to proceed with

The usage of jest-preview in the codebase is minimal and basic:

  • Only used for debug imports in two test files
  • Configured in jest.config.js for CSS and file transformations
  • These features are stable across both versions (0.2.3 and 0.3.1)

The downgrade doesn't pose any compatibility risks as the codebase only uses core features that have been stable since version 0.2.x. Both versions were also published on the same date (2022-10-28), suggesting they are part of the same release cycle.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check jest-preview versions and changelog

# Get latest version and release info
npm view jest-preview versions --json | jq -r '.[]' | sort -V
npm view [email protected] time.modified
npm view [email protected] time.modified

Length of output: 893


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for jest-preview usage in test files
rg -l "jest-preview" --type-add 'test:*.{test,spec}.*' --type test

# Search for jest-preview configuration
rg -l "jest-preview" --type json
rg -l "jest-preview" --type js

# Check package-lock.json for dependency tree
fd "package-lock.json" --exec jq -r '.packages | .[] | select(.name == "jest-preview") | .version' {} \;

Length of output: 380


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how jest-preview is used in test files
rg -A 5 -B 5 "jest-preview" src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.test.tsx src/components/UserPortal/EventCard/EventCard.test.tsx

# Check jest-preview configuration in jest config
cat jest.config.js

Length of output: 4409

jest-preview.config.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

673-691: Consolidate duplicate button container styles.

The .btncon .btnsContainer class duplicates styles from the existing .btnsContainer class. Consider consolidating these styles to reduce maintenance overhead and improve consistency.

- .btncon .btnsContainer {
+ .btnsContainer {
  display: flex;
-  margin: 0.5rem 0 1.5rem 0;
+  margin: 0.5rem 0 1.5rem;
}

- .btncon .btnsContainer .input {
+ .btnsContainer .input {
  flex: 1;
  min-width: 18rem;
  position: relative;
}

- .btncon .btnsContainer input {
+ .btnsContainer input {
  outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
}

- .btncon .btnsContainer .input button {
+ .btnsContainer .input button {
  width: 52px;
}

750-798: Improve modal styles for better responsiveness and maintainability.

The modal styles use hard-coded colors and fixed dimensions that might not work well across different screen sizes.

.itemModal {
-  max-width: 80vw;
-  margin-top: 2vh;
-  margin-left: 13vw;
+  max-width: min(80vw, 1200px);
+  margin: 2vh auto 0;
}

.titlemodal {
-  color: #707070;
+  color: var(--text-secondary);
  font-weight: 600;
  font-size: 32px;
-  width: 65%;
+  width: 100%;
+  max-width: 65%;
  margin-bottom: 0px;
}

.modalTable {
  max-height: 220px;
+  max-height: min(220px, 50vh);
  overflow-y: auto;
}

Line range hint 1-798: Consider implementing a CSS custom properties system.

While consolidating styles into a global file is a good first step, consider implementing a comprehensive CSS custom properties (variables) system to:

  1. Define a consistent color palette
  2. Create a typography scale
  3. Establish spacing units
  4. Define breakpoints for responsive design

This would make the styles more maintainable and ensure consistency across the application.

Example structure:

:root {
  /* Colors */
  --brand-primary: #31bb6b;
  --brand-primary-light: #31bb6a50;
  --text-primary: #000000;
  --text-secondary: #707070;

  /* Typography */
  --font-size-sm: 0.875rem;
  --font-size-base: 1rem;
  --font-size-lg: 1.25rem;

  /* Spacing */
  --spacing-xs: 0.25rem;
  --spacing-sm: 0.5rem;
  --spacing-md: 1rem;

  /* Breakpoints */
  --breakpoint-sm: 520px;
  --breakpoint-md: 1020px;
  --breakpoint-lg: 1120px;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57fcb6f and 7941dcc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

720-730: LGTM! Well-structured table styles.

The table styles follow a consistent pattern using Bootstrap variables and are well-organized.

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cioppolo14
Copy link
Contributor

@gurramkarthiknetha Please fix the failed tests and address coderabbit's comments.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

617-622: Consider grouping related selectors for better maintainability.

The individual radio button selectors can be combined using a comma separator for better maintainability and reduced code duplication.

-#individualRadio,
-#requestsRadio,
-#groupsRadio,
-.toggleBtn:hover {
+#individualRadio, #requestsRadio, #groupsRadio, .toggleBtn:hover {
  color: var(--brand-primary) !important;
}

690-703: Consider removing !important flags from disabled input styles.

The -webkit-text-fill-color properties use !important flags which could be avoided by using more specific selectors.

-.noOutline input:disabled {
-  -webkit-text-fill-color: black !important;
+.noOutline input:disabled {
+  -webkit-text-fill-color: black;
}

-.noOutline textarea:disabled {
-  -webkit-text-fill-color: black !important;
+.noOutline textarea:disabled {
+  -webkit-text-fill-color: black;
}

755-761: Convert hard-coded color to CSS variable.

The .titlemodal class uses a hard-coded color value which should be replaced with a CSS variable.

.titlemodal {
-  color: #707070;
+  color: var(--modal-title-color);
  font-weight: 600;
  font-size: 32px;
  width: 65%;
  margin-bottom: 0px;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7941dcc and 518efbb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/style/app.module.css (5)

628-636: LGTM!

The dropdown styles are well-structured and use appropriate flexbox properties.


637-653: Remove duplicate margin-top property.

The .greenregbtn class contains a duplicate margin-top property.


710-717: Convert hard-coded colors to CSS variables.

The .dropdowns class uses hard-coded color values which should be replaced with CSS variables.


718-729: LGTM!

The table styles are well-structured and use appropriate CSS variables for colors.


738-746: LGTM!

The status indicator styles properly use CSS variables as recommended.

@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

image now all tests are passed

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (2)

83-85: Consider making class name assertions more specific and maintainable

While the current approach of checking for _expand and _contract substrings works, it could be made more robust and maintainable.

Consider these improvements:

-    expect(mainPageElement.className).toMatch('_expand');
+    expect(mainPageElement.className).toMatch(new RegExp(`\\b${styles.expand}\\b`));

-    expect(mainPageElement.className).toMatch('_contract');
+    expect(mainPageElement.className).toMatch(new RegExp(`\\b${styles.contract}\\b`));

This approach:

  1. Uses the actual class names from the styles object
  2. Ensures exact word boundary matching
  3. Makes the tests more resilient to CSS module name changes

Also applies to: 90-91


83-84: Add more descriptive test comments

The current comment could be more specific about what's being tested.

-    // Check for a class indicating the drawer is contracted (use stringContaining in the class)
+    // Verify the main page expands when drawer is contracted
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 518efbb and cbb63c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/setupTests.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/setupTests.ts (1)

35-35: ⚠️ Potential issue

The timeout increase requires investigation.

Increasing the Jest timeout to 30 seconds is concerning as it:

  1. Could mask underlying performance issues in tests
  2. Doesn't align with the PR's objective of CSS refactoring
  3. May indicate problems with test setup or async operations

Consider these alternatives:

  1. Investigate why tests need such a long timeout
  2. Use more targeted timeouts for specific slow tests:
describe('slow test suite', () => {
  jest.setTimeout(10000); // Smaller, suite-specific timeout
  test('slow test', async () => {
    // test code
  });
});
  1. Optimize test setup and teardown to reduce execution time
  2. If using async operations, ensure proper cleanup and resolution

Let's identify which tests are taking longer:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now make an informed assessment about the timeout increase:

Timeout increase appears justified based on codebase analysis

The 30-second timeout appears warranted because:

  1. The codebase has extensive async testing with numerous waitFor calls and complex setup blocks
  2. Many test files contain multiple async operations that need to complete
  3. Several test files already explicitly set 30 second timeouts (e.g. src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.test.tsx)
  4. The tests involve complex UI components with state management, GraphQL operations, and multi-step workflows

The timeout increase is a reasonable configuration change to accommodate the actual testing needs rather than masking performance issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find test files that might contain slow tests
# Look for patterns that might indicate slow operations

# Search for async tests
echo "Searching for async test patterns..."
rg -l "test\(.*async" --type ts

# Look for specific timing patterns
echo "Searching for existing timeout configurations..."
rg "setTimeout|waitFor|delay" --type ts

# Check for large setup blocks
echo "Checking for potentially expensive setup..."
rg "beforeAll|beforeEach" -A 5 --type ts

Length of output: 70969

src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1)

83-91: Verify test compatibility with new global CSS structure

Since this PR consolidates CSS into a global file, we should verify that these tests remain valid with the new CSS structure.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2024
@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

image now all tests are passed

All tests pass on my local machine, but the [Test Application (pull_request)] is failing.

@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

image tests are passed in my local machine

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix:

  1. Any failing tests (Click on the details link for more information)
  2. Any conflicting files

Make sure CodeRabbit.ai approves your changes

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.29%. Comparing base (a16e02e) to head (f2d44b6).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/setupTests.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2675      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             82.81%   86.29%   +3.47%     
====================================================
  Files                   295      312      +17     
  Lines                  7274     8134     +860     
  Branches               1592     1785     +193     
====================================================
+ Hits                   6024     7019     +995     
+ Misses                 1012      943      -69     
+ Partials                238      172      -66     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 20, 2024
@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please fix:

  1. Any failing tests (Click on the details link for more information)
  2. Any conflicting files

Make sure CodeRabbit.ai approves your changes

now is this ok ??

@Cioppolo14
Copy link
Contributor

@gurramkarthiknetha Please fix the failing tests.

@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Contributor Author

gurramkarthiknetha commented Dec 21, 2024

@gurramkarthiknetha Please fix the failing tests.

All tests have passed, except for the schema.graphql, which is not related to my PR

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please try to get the test code coverage test to pass for your modified files. We need the code coverage to match that of the repository overall to maintain the code's stability

image

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if any of these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. The code does not comply with our linting check or other related formatting requirements

Here are some steps to take:

  1. Click on the Details link for the tests to get an explanation of the cause(s)
  2. You may have to fix a test that is not related to this PR as in some rare cases we merge faulty test code. If this is the case, fix the test in this PR. Do not open another issue.

We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Additional notes:

  1. Ensure that CodeRabbit.ai approves your work
  2. Please fix any conflicting files

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

883-891: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use CSS variables for status indicators.

The status classes use hardcoded colors. This matches a previous review comment about using CSS variables for status indicators.

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1)

87-88: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment.

The added comment improves code readability. Consider making it more specific:

-    // Check for expand class after opening
+    // Check for contract class after opening drawer
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 87-87: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)

src/style/app.module.css (3)

761-771: Consider using CSS custom properties for radio button styles.

The radio button styles use hardcoded color values. Consider using the existing CSS variables for consistency.

-  color: var(--brand-primary) !important;
+  color: var(--bs-primary) !important;

-  background-color: var(--brand-primary-light) !important;
+  background-color: var(--bs-primary-light) !important;

924-930: Improve image handling in TableImages class.

The .TableImages class could benefit from better fallback values and aspect ratio preservation.

.TableImages {
  object-fit: cover;
+  aspect-ratio: 1/1;
  width: var(--image-width, 100%);
  height: var(--image-height, auto);
  border-radius: 0;
  margin-right: var(--image-spacing, 8px);
+  max-width: 100%;
+  height: auto;
}

938-941: Consider using CSS Grid for modal table layout.

The .modalTable class uses fixed height which might cause content truncation. Consider using CSS Grid for better content handling.

.modalTable {
-  max-height: 220px;
+  display: grid;
+  grid-template-rows: auto minmax(0, 1fr);
+  max-height: 80vh;
  overflow-y: auto;
+  gap: 1rem;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between abdea88 and 3883316.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx

[error] 87-87: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)

855-861: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace hardcoded colors with CSS variables.

The .dropdowns class uses hardcoded color values that should use existing CSS variables.

.dropdowns {
  background-color: white;
-  border: 1px solid #31bb6b;
+  border: 1px solid var(--bs-primary);
  position: relative;
  display: inline-block;
-  color: #31bb6b;
+  color: var(--bs-primary);
}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


782-798: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize button transitions.

The .greenregbtn class has duplicate properties and could benefit from CSS custom properties.

.greenregbtn {
-  margin-top: 1rem;
+  --btn-padding: 10px;
+  --btn-shadow: 0 2px 2px var(--bs-gray-300);
+  
+  margin: 1rem 0 0;
  border: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-300);
-  box-shadow: 0 2px 2px var(--bs-gray-300);
+  box-shadow: var(--btn-shadow);
-  padding: 10px 10px;
+  padding: var(--btn-padding);
  border-radius: 5px;
  background-color: var(--bs-primary);
  width: 100%;
  font-size: 16px;
  color: var(--bs-white);
  outline: none;
  font-weight: 600;
  cursor: pointer;
  transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out;
}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

src/style/app.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if any of these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. The code does not comply with our linting check or other related formatting requirements

Here are some steps to take:

  1. Click on the Details link for the tests to get an explanation of the cause(s)
  2. You may have to fix a test that is not related to this PR as in some rare cases we merge faulty test code. If this is the case, fix the test in this PR. Do not open another issue.

We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Additional notes:

  1. Ensure that CodeRabbit.ai approves your work
  2. Please fix any conflicting files

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

892-908: Optimize button transitions.

The .greenregbtn class has good use of CSS variables but could benefit from performance optimization.

 .greenregbtn {
   /* ... other properties ... */
-  transition:
-    transform 0.2s,
-    box-shadow 0.2s;
+  transition: all 0.2s ease;
 }

1004-1052: Consider responsive modal width.

The modal styles use fixed units (vw) which might cause issues on very small or large screens.

 .itemModal {
-  max-width: 80vw;
+  max-width: min(80vw, 1200px);
   margin-top: 2vh;
-  margin-left: 13vw;
+  margin-inline: auto;
 }

1035-1041: Use logical properties for RTL support.

The .TableImages class uses directional margin which may cause issues in RTL layouts.

 .TableImages {
   object-fit: cover;
   width: var(--image-width, 100%);
   height: var(--image-height, auto);
   border-radius: 0;
-  margin-right: var(--image-spacing, 8px);
+  margin-inline-end: var(--image-spacing, 8px);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3883316 and f2d44b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/setupTests.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/components/OrganizationScreen/OrganizationScreen.test.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/setupTests.ts

[warning] 35-35: src/setupTests.ts#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/setupTests.ts (1)

35-35: Verify the need for increased Jest timeout.

While increasing the timeout can help with slow tests, it may mask underlying performance issues. Consider:

  1. Investigating which tests are hitting the default timeout
  2. Optimizing slow tests if possible
  3. Adding timeout only to specific slow tests instead of globally
✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that there are numerous test files in the codebase with async tests, but I need to specifically look for tests that might be timing out. Let me search for test timeouts and test durations.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response. The codebase shows:

  1. The global Jest timeout of 30000ms (30 seconds) in setupTests.ts is justified because:

    • There are numerous async tests across the codebase that perform complex operations
    • Many tests involve GraphQL operations with mock delays (e.g., StaticMockLink with delays)
    • Tests frequently use waitFor assertions that need time to resolve
    • Some components like AddOnRegister have intentional delays in their functionality
    • The codebase has extensive integration tests that test multiple components together
  2. No individual tests are showing signs of timeout issues or using excessive individual timeouts. The timeouts seen in tests are mostly short waits for component rendering or state updates.

The 30-second global timeout is appropriate for this codebase's testing needs. While it's generally good practice to optimize test performance, in this case the timeout value is reasonable given:

  • The complex nature of the application with many async operations
  • The comprehensive test suite with integration tests
  • The presence of GraphQL operations that may have network delays even in tests
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find test files with potentially slow tests
rg -l "test|it|describe" "src/**/*.test.*" "src/**/*.spec.*" | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  # Look for async tests and timing patterns
  rg -A 5 "^[[:space:]]*(test|it|describe)\(.*async" "$file"
  rg "setTimeout|waitFor|delay" "$file"
done

Length of output: 189


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try finding test files without glob patterns
fd ".*\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$" src/

# Then look for async tests and timing patterns in all files
echo "=== Searching for async tests ==="
rg -A 5 "^[[:space:]]*(test|it|describe)\(.*async"

echo "=== Searching for timing patterns ==="
rg "setTimeout|waitFor|delay"

Length of output: 130489


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test timeout configurations and long-running operations
echo "=== Searching for test timeout configurations ==="
rg -B2 -A2 "timeout|jest\.setTimeout|waitFor.*\d+|delay.*\d+"

echo "=== Searching for potentially slow operations in tests ==="
rg "beforeAll|beforeEach|afterAll|afterEach" -A 5

Length of output: 67120

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 35-35: src/setupTests.ts#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests

src/style/app.module.css (5)

871-881: Consider using CSS custom properties for radio button styles.

The radio button styles use hardcoded color values. Consider using CSS variables for better maintainability.


883-891: LGTM: Dropdown styles follow best practices.

The dropdown styles are well-structured and use flexbox appropriately for layout.


945-952: Replace WebKit-specific styles with standard properties.

The -webkit-text-fill-color property is non-standard.


974-984: LGTM: Table styles use semantic class names.

The table styles follow good practices by using semantic class names and CSS variables.


994-1002: LGTM: Status indicators use CSS variables.

The status indicator styles properly use CSS variables for colors, making them maintainable.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please improve the code coverage for the patch.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 3d6b6bc into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 22, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants