added test case for day view in newly created event #2192
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Yashgupta9330 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.test.tsx (8)
9-11: Import statement forCREATE_EVENT_MUTATIONlooks good.The addition of
CREATE_EVENT_MUTATIONis appropriate for testing the event creation functionality.
92-124: Mock request forCREATE_EVENT_MUTATIONis well-structured.The mock includes all necessary variables to simulate event creation, which is essential for testing.
168-177: Test case for rendering current month and year is effective.The use of
getByTestIdensures reliable verification of the displayed month and year.
291-308: Test case for current time indicator is well-implemented.The test ensures that the current time indicator is present and styled correctly.
312-331: Test case for all-day events is appropriate.The test ensures that all-day events are displayed in the correct section, verifying proper rendering.
333-353: Test case for "Today" button functionality is effective.The test simulates user interaction with the "Today" button and verifies the expected behavior.
354-451: Test case for handling window resize is well-designed.The test ensures the component responds correctly to window resize events, supporting responsive design.
542-572: Test case for displaying newly created events is comprehensive.The test ensures that newly created events are displayed correctly in the day view, validating the event creation functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
INSTALLATION.md (1)
204-206: Add language specification to code blocks.To improve readability and adhere to Markdownlint guidelines, specify the language for the code blocks.
-``` +```bashAlso applies to: 211-212, 217-218 <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 204-204: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 637f7d97c15d0c138b1f4c1f059400d049d99778 and dcc0061008d51fd04e51931dd50693de9cadd57e. </details> <details> <summary>Files selected for processing (4)</summary> * INSTALLATION.md (2 hunks) * setup.ts (8 hunks) * src/setup/askForTalawaWebsocketUrl/askForTalawaWebsocketUrl.test.ts (1 hunks) * src/setup/askForTalawaWebsocketUrl/askForTalawaWebsocketUrl.ts (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>INSTALLATION.md</summary><blockquote> 204-204: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 210-210: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 216-216: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>Additional comments not posted (3)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/setup/askForTalawaWebsocketUrl/askForTalawaWebsocketUrl.test.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `5-30`: **Well-written test for user-provided endpoint.** The test effectively mocks the `inquirer.prompt` function and verifies that the function returns the user-provided endpoint. The expectations are clear and appropriate. --- `33-57`: **Good coverage for default endpoint scenario.** This test case ensures that the default endpoint is returned when no input is provided by the user. The mock implementation correctly simulates this behavior. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>INSTALLATION.md (1)</summary><blockquote> `170-170`: **LGTM! The addition of `REACT_APP_BACKEND_WEBSOCKET_URL` is clear and consistent.** The instructions for setting up the new environment variable are well-integrated into the existing documentation. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
| export async function askForTalawaWebsocketUrl(): Promise<string> { | ||
| const { endpoint } = await inquirer.prompt([ | ||
| { | ||
| type: 'input', | ||
| name: 'endpoint', | ||
| message: 'Enter your talawa-websocket endpoint:', | ||
| default: 'ws://localhost:4000/graphql/', | ||
| }, | ||
| ]); | ||
| return endpoint; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding input validation for the WebSocket URL.
Currently, the function does not validate the user input. It would be beneficial to add validation to ensure the provided endpoint is a valid WebSocket URL.
import { URL } from 'url';
export async function askForTalawaWebsocketUrl(): Promise<string> {
const { endpoint } = await inquirer.prompt([
{
type: 'input',
name: 'endpoint',
message: 'Enter your talawa-websocket endpoint:',
default: 'ws://localhost:4000/graphql/',
validate: (input: string) => {
try {
new URL(input);
return true;
} catch {
return 'Please enter a valid WebSocket URL.';
}
},
},
]);
return endpoint;
}| @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ export async function main(): Promise<void> { | |||
| const port = dotenv.parse(fs.readFileSync('.env')).PORT; | |||
|
|
|||
| fs.readFile('.env', 'utf8', (err, data) => { | |||
| if (err) throw err; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling with informative messages.
Currently, the error handling simply throws the error. Consider providing more context in the error messages to aid debugging.
fs.readFile('.env', 'utf8', (err, data) => {
if (err) throw new Error(`Failed to read .env file: ${err.message}`);
const result = data.replace(`PORT=${port}`, `PORT=${customPort}`);
fs.writeFileSync('.env', result, 'utf8');
});Repeat similar enhancements for other file read operations.
Also applies to: 85-85, 126-126, 148-148, 191-191, 212-212
Feature: Adds test cases for the newly created event
Fixes #2122
What
Why
How
EventCalendar.test.tsxto validate that the current day is correctly displayed.Additional Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores