fix/upgrade-@test/jest

[kauxp]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Upgrade of dependencies

Issue Number:

Fixes #1942

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes. Existing tests have been validated to ensure compatibility.

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

This pull request addresses the issue of upgrading @types/jest as described in issue #1942. The previous attempt to upgrade these dependencies via the dependabot job resulted in failing tests, which indicated that additional updates were required for compatibility. This major revision upgrade involves updating to the latest versions of jest and @types/jest. The goal is to ensure that the new versions integrate seamlessly without affecting existing functionality, and that all tests pass successfully.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes. All existing configurations have been preserved, and no additional functionality has been modified.

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a YAML configuration for language settings, review processes, and chat functionalities.
  • Added a new environment variable configuration template for local development.
  • Implemented a variety of GraphQL mutations and queries for managing action items, events, and user interactions.
  • Launched multiple localization files for various languages to enhance user experience.
  • Upgraded type definitions for Jest to improve compatibility with the latest framework updates.

• Documentation

  • Enhanced the README.md and added detailed installation and contribution guidelines.

• Style

  • Added new SCSS files and variables to standardize and improve styling across the application.

• Chores

  • Introduced automation workflows for dependency management and code quality checks.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The primary change involves upgrading the @types/jest package from version ^26.0.24 to ^29.5.12 in the package.json file. This update aligns the type definitions for Jest with the latest framework enhancements, ensuring better compatibility and access to new features while maintaining the existing project setup.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
package.json	Updated @types/jest from ^26.0.24 to ^29.5.12

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Upgrade @types/jest to its latest version (#1942)	✅
Ensure compatibility with jest (#1942)	❓	Compatibility with jest not confirmed in this PR.
Maintain existing configurations (#1942)	✅
Preserve existing functionality (#1942)	✅
Pass all tests (#1942)	❌	No information provided on test status post-upgrade.

Poem

In fields of green, I leap for joy,
A new Jest version, oh what a ploy!
With types so fresh, our code will dance,
Bugs and errors, we’ll now enhance!
Hoppy days are here, let’s code away,
In rabbit holes, we’ll surely play! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3c3555 and 56bbfaa.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• package.json

[Cioppolo14]

@kauxp Please fix the failing tests.

[palisadoes]

Please submit your PRs against our develop branch. To facilitate our reviews, the source and target branches in the PR must be different. The failing test indicates this. Closing.