feat: add graph engineering review stack - #9
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 124112c8a4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| --- | ||
| description: Run a multi-angle review graph for complex changes that need more than one generic review pass |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For existing projects using the README’s advertised just add-claude path, templates/justfile still generates only the pre-existing commands and agents, so this command and review-graph-orchestrator.md are never installed; similarly, just add-planning does not install the new graph workflow template. Add these artifacts to the corresponding scaffold recipes so users receive the feature rather than only repository clones having it.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| Minimum commands: | ||
| ```bash | ||
| git status | ||
| git diff main...HEAD | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When /review-graph is run before all current work has been committed, this is a commit-to-commit diff and silently excludes staged and unstaged changes, while git status provides only filenames/statuses. The official git diff documentation distinguishes the <commit>...<commit> form from the form that compares a commit with the working tree; gather the index and working-tree diffs as well so the final verdict cannot approve changes that none of the review lenses inspected.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
No description provided.