Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(api): further guidance on LPD – time consumption and using clean tips #16313

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

ecormany
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Provide more clarity on LPD requiring fresh, dry tips. Also note that it takes quite some time, so protocol authors should be cautious about enabling it globally.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Sandbox links

Changelog

  • Additions to both sections where we talk about LPD.
  • Removed an old RST comment.

Review requests

Is this clear enough about the risks/downsides of using global LPD, especially with complex commands?

Risk assessment

none

Copy link
Contributor

@jwwojak jwwojak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤔 Not sure and have some questions. Thanks for considering these.

api/docs/v2/basic_commands/liquids.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/docs/v2/pipettes/loading.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
api/docs/v2/pipettes/loading.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
api/docs/v2/basic_commands/liquids.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@jwwojak jwwojak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yezzzzz.
🚢

@ecormany ecormany merged commit f793e65 into edge Sep 20, 2024
18 of 20 checks passed
@ecormany ecormany deleted the docs-lpd-timing-and-wet-tips branch September 20, 2024 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants