Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(api): Disable tip presence check on 8ch single and partial 2 thru 3 nozzle #16312

Merged

Conversation

CaseyBatten
Copy link
Contributor

@CaseyBatten CaseyBatten commented Sep 19, 2024

Overview

Covers RABR-623, RABR-624

Disable tip presence sensing on the 8ch Flex pipette for Single tip configuration and for Partial Column

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Tested on Flex with 8ch pipette to confirm tip presence no used for 1-3 nozzle configurations.

Re-tested Flex 96ch to ensure tip presence sensing not used for single nozzle configuration.

Changelog

Expanded tip handle tip presence validation to screen for 8ch configurations.

Review requests

Does this offer sufficient coverage?

Risk assessment

Low - disables tip presence check exclusively on some new features to 8.0.0.

Copy link
Contributor

@SyntaxColoring SyntaxColoring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks straightforward, thanks—just some questions for posterity.

NozzleConfigurationType.SINGLE,
NozzleConfigurationType.COLUMN,
]
supported_partial_nozzle_minimum = 4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you elaborate in the in-code comments about where 4 comes from?

):
# Tip presence sensing is not supported for single tip pick up on the 96ch Flex Pipette
# Tip presence sensing is not supported for single tip pick up on the 96ch Flex Pipette, nor with single and some partial layous of the 8ch Flex Pipette
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you elaborate in the in-code comments about why these layouts aren't supported?

Copy link
Contributor

@vegano1 vegano1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good
I agree with @SyntaxColoring on adding comments explaining why we are doing this.

@CaseyBatten CaseyBatten merged commit 1e268d3 into chore_release-8.0.0 Sep 20, 2024
21 checks passed
@CaseyBatten CaseyBatten deleted the tip_presence_disable_8ch_single_partial branch September 20, 2024 15:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants