Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decouple openzeppelin testing versioning #1366

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ericnordelo
Copy link
Member

This PR decouples the version of openzeppelin_testing from the library version used for the rest of the packages.

It removes the documentation entry from the doc-site, since this one is pegged to the library version, and includes a local docs folder in markdown format generated by using scarb doc

@ericnordelo ericnordelo requested a review from immrsd March 4, 2025 10:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.51%. Comparing base (d6c2469) to head (6f87a86).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.51%   92.51%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines        3526     3526           
=======================================
  Hits         3262     3262           
  Misses        264      264           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d6c2469...6f87a86. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@immrsd immrsd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the prepare-release workflows thoroughly and ran through the .md files. Good job, LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants