Repository navigation
docs: require a cheapest disconfirming test - #65
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a docs-only standard requiring serious claims to name the cheapest safe test that would lower confidence in the claim.
Why
A verification protocol should not only ask for evidence. It should ask what would change the repository's mind. This makes reversal paths explicit and helps reviewers catch claims with no clear falsifier.
Scope
Documentation only. No schema, workflow, generated file, or problem-pack content changed.
Review focus
Please review whether this should remain advisory or become a required field for safety-sensitive, quantitative, or prioritization-changing claims.