Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update packages #6358

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update packages #6358

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

jeffkl
Copy link
Contributor

@jeffkl jeffkl commented Mar 28, 2025

Bug

Fixes: https://github.com/NuGet/Client.Engineering/issues/3211

Description

This updates packages to ensure that we're not using a version of MessagePack with known vulnerabilities. This gets us onto versoin 2.5.295 which is what Visual Studio currently has an assembly binding redirect to:

image

image

PR Checklist

  • Meaningful title, helpful description and a linked NuGet/Home issue
  • Added tests
  • Link to an issue or pull request to update docs if this PR changes settings, environment variables, new feature, etc.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@jeffkl jeffkl force-pushed the dev-jeffkl-update-packages branch from c9a4074 to d760ec2 Compare March 31, 2025 18:34
@jeffkl jeffkl changed the title DRAFT Update packages Update packages Mar 31, 2025
@jeffkl jeffkl requested a review from zivkan March 31, 2025 18:35
@jeffkl jeffkl marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 18:39
@jeffkl jeffkl requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2025 18:39
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Build" IncludeAssets="None" PrivateAssets="all"/>
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Build.Framework" IncludeAssets="None" PrivateAssets="all"/>
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Build" IncludeAssets="None" PrivateAssets="all" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Build.Framework" IncludeAssets="None" PrivateAssets="all" NoWarn="NU1605" />
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the downgrade we're suppressing here?

This is not your change, but do you know why we have an IncludeAssets="None", PrivateAssets="all" package? Is it forcing some specific resolution?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants