Adds in Mannequins from Vanderlin/AP#355
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Adds in Mannequins
unit0016
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
About The Pull Request
Adds in Mannequins based on PRS:
mannequin port: Azure-Peak/Azure-Peak#2378
part of spliting the armor: Azure-Peak/Azure-Peak#2397
Proof reading port above: Azure-Peak/Azure-Peak#2551
Testing Evidence
showing off mannequins with nothing on:
showing female maniquin wearing a female archivist robe:
showing nothing shows up on a male model for a female piece of clothing
Why It's Good For The Game
easier for tailors to show off thier goods and a place for knights to hang their armor