chore(governance): apply ORG-DEV-OTOI-1.0.0 compliance baseline#1
chore(governance): apply ORG-DEV-OTOI-1.0.0 compliance baseline#1JDUB1216 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…line Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces comprehensive governance and coordination documentation for coding agents operating in the repository, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, NLT-DEV-OTOI.md, and active thread tracking. The review feedback points out a minor inconsistency in CLAUDE.md regarding the step number of the session start protocol, which should be updated to Step 2 for alignment with the other documents.
| # CLAUDE.md — skills | ||
| ## Governance: ORG-DEV-OTOI-1.0.0 | Authority: Joshua W. Dorsey, Sr. | ||
|
|
||
| This file provides repo-specific context for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot agents operating in `skills`. It must be read as Step 3 of the OTOI Section 4.1 session start protocol. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In CLAUDE.md, it states that this file must be read as Step 3 of the OTOI Section 4.1 session start protocol. However, according to both NLT-DEV-OTOI.md (Section 4.1) and AGENTS.md (Session Start), reading CLAUDE.md is actually Step 2 of the protocol, while Step 3 is reading docs/active-threads.md. Please update this to Step 2 to maintain consistency across all governance documents.
| This file provides repo-specific context for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot agents operating in `skills`. It must be read as Step 3 of the OTOI Section 4.1 session start protocol. | |
| This file provides repo-specific context for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot agents operating in skills. It must be read as Step 2 of the OTOI Section 4.1 session start protocol. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 23aeb693c4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "Codex (@codex) review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "Codex (@codex) address that feedback".
| 2. Write a handoff record to `docs/agent-log/handoffs/` using `templates/handoff-record.json` | ||
| 3. Document any open escalations in `docs/escalations/` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add the handoff and escalation paths before requiring them
When an agent ends a significant session and follows this new gateway, the required templates/handoff-record.json and docs/escalations/ paths are not present in the committed tree (I checked the repo file list for templates/** and docs/escalations/**). That leaves the documented handoff/escalation workflow with no destination/template to use, so agents either have to invent the format/location or skip the required record.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Governance Compliance — ORG-DEV-OTOI-1.0.0
Applies NLT governance baseline:
Agent: Copilot | Standard: ORG-DEV-OTOI-1.0.0 | Authority: Joshua W. Dorsey, Sr.