Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Imapsync): Sieve filter support #152

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

DavidePrincipi
Copy link
Member

Fix documentation for NethServer/dev#7230

Comment on lines -48 to -51
- Sieve filters do not work with Imapsync, as they are evaluated during
LMTP delivery. Instead, Imapsync uses IMAP commands to interact directly
with Dovecot, bypassing LMTP and preventing the execution of Sieve
scripts.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd add an explanation for it, something like:

Sieve filters are evaluated at the end, only on the inbox folder. The only limitation is that the "sieve_before" filter, which is used to move the email to spam, is not executed. This is intentional because spam control should be performed by the original mail server.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Considering only INBOX is the normal behavior during LMTP delivery: it is the expected behavior of the user's Sieve script. As anti-spam checks are not executed messages are not moved to Junk automatically.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd rather say that sieve filters are working, not matter the form you prefer: the user must be informed.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll try to improve the page

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants