Use ruff rather than black and isort for linting #75
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jbcoe
force-pushed
the
jbcoe/drop-isort-and-black
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e069e91 to
bdd57c7
Compare
jbcoe
force-pushed
the
jbcoe/drop-isort-and-black
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1108d89 to
acf77de
Compare
jbcoe
force-pushed
the
jbcoe/drop-isort-and-black
branch
from
acf77de to
31eb278
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm proposing this as simplification as we's lose dependencies on black and isort and linting runs a little faster.
Happy to drop this as unnecessary code-churn if no-one is keen.