[chuangz0]

Dev Engineer Review

The sender now retains failed requests while sent chunks remain unanswered. Matching ACKs and NACKs reduce the outstanding set. A failed result resolves after the configured answer wait or immediately on shutdown. If answers remain outstanding, the result does not prove that the destination is quiescent. Running gathers can also keep source memory in use after failure.

BounceTransferStatus::isCompleted() now requires both a ready result and quiescence. Callers must use wait() to read the transfer outcome; isCompleted() alone does not indicate success. The receiver synchronizes its stream before it NACKs a failed scatter.

The wire protocol version changes from 2 to 3. Peers must use compatible versions. This conflicts with the PR description’s claim that the version is unchanged. The sender also rejects non-positive request timeouts. Ownership-mode concerns remain out of scope. Review finding counts are unavailable.

QA Engineer Review

The changes add and modify bounce tests, helpers, and test build configuration. The tests cover failure resolution, sent-chunk answer matching, timeout and shutdown paths, duplicate or malformed messages, receiver behavior, and end-to-end transfer status. The H100 CI list includes the C++ bounce unit-test selector. The QA lists include a related Python bounce integration test, but no manual-QA entry for the changed C++ unit tests was found.

The supplied PR description reports that five bounce gtest binaries passed with zero skips. The supplied CI reports include two failures, but give no specific test failures. The L40S-PyTorch-2 stage was paused, reducing coverage. Coverage verdict: needs follow-up. The reported CI failures need investigation; the available evidence does not identify their causes.

Per-File QA Perspective

• cpp/include/tensorrt_llm/executor/transferAgent.h — Updates the isCompleted() contract. Verify that callers distinguish completion from transfer success.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransferStatus.h — Adds future-backed status behavior and requires quiescence for completion. Verify timeout, invalid-future, and in-doubt failure handling.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.cpp — Changes failure tracking, ACK/NACK handling, timeout resolution, and scatter-failure synchronization. Verify outstanding chunks and gathers are retained until they can no longer access memory.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.h — Adds failed-request tracking and count accessors. Verify the declarations and lifecycle match the implementation.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/transferAgent.cpp — Uses the extracted BounceTransferStatus. Verify the submit path preserves expected caller-visible status behavior.
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceAgentE2ETest.cpp — Covers successful completion and receiver shutdown before progress. The C++ bounce selector is listed in H100 CI; no corresponding manual-QA entry was found.
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceTestNixlNode.h — Changes shared test-agent configuration by disabling the listen thread. Verify tests using this helper do not require listening behavior.
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceTransportFailureTest.cpp — Adds transport failure-path tests for message validation, answer matching, timeouts, peer removal, and shutdown. The C++ bounce selector is listed in H100 CI; no corresponding manual-QA entry was found.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceConfig.h — Documents timeout validation and its role in failed-request answer waits. Verify the configuration layer and sender enforce the documented positive-timeout requirement.
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/CMakeLists.txt — Adds the failed-request test target and changes reactor test timeout settings. Verify the new target is included in the intended test build and CI selector.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceMessage.h — Changes kBounceVersion to 3 and clarifies NACK semantics. Verify peer-version mismatch handling and compatibility expectations.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceResult.cpp — Implements answer tracking, quiescence, and failure resolution. Verify deadline refresh and unanswered-chunk behavior at timeout.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceResult.h — Adds failure reasons, outstanding-access tracking, and the failed-request API. Verify result lifetime and source-read tracking across asynchronous work.
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/CMakeLists.txt — Adds BounceResult.cpp to the bounce core library. Verify the library and its consumers link the new implementation.
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceFailedRequestTest.cpp — Adds host-side model and event-order tests for failed-request resolution and status. The C++ bounce selector is listed in H100 CI; no corresponding manual-QA entry was found.

Description

The C++ transfer-agent bounce moves a KV write in chunks. For each chunk, the sender gathers it from the source KV into staging, RDMA-writes it into the receiver's arena, and sends DATA. The receiver then scatters the chunk into the destination KV pages and answers ACK (after cudaStreamSynchronize) or NACK.

On success the sender resolves only after every ACK. On failure (write or gather failure, receiver NACK, forgetPeer, no-progress timeout, shutdown) it resolved kFAILURE immediately, while chunks whose DATA was already out could still be queued or running on the receiver. A late scatter could therefore write pages the caller had already reused. Separately, isCompleted() was false on every failure, so the ownership bridge could never prove that a failed bounce transfer had stopped touching memory.

This PR provides the C++ contract the ownership bridge needs before it admits bounce.

Contract

• wait() is the logical outcome. On failure it returns once the receiver has answered (ACK or NACK) every chunk whose DATA was sent, or request_timeout_ms after the failure or after the receiver's last answer. The answer wait restarts on each answer, so a live but slow receiver can stretch it to at most N × request_timeout_ms after the failure, where N is the number of sent chunks unanswered at the failure. It returns at once after kNoProgressTimeout and at shutdown. A failure resolved before every answer arrived is in-doubt.
• isCompleted() is true once the request no longer reads its source and no longer writes its destination, and it never turns back to false. After a failure it can turn true later than wait() returns: a late answer, or an orphaned gather finishing, completes it.
• TransferStatus::isCompleted states this as one backend-independent contract about the caller's source and destination memory. Mooncake is the documented exception, and a NIXL status reads false after release() or once its agent is gone.

Design

The safety-relevant decisions live in a small pure core, bounce/BounceResult.{h,cpp}, with no CUDA, NIXL, zmq or threads:

• OutstandingAccess is what a failed request may still do to caller memory: its unanswered sent chunks, matched by chunk index and region, and its running gathers, each held as a SourceRead that ends when the orphaned gather is dropped. It is recorded before the result is set and only shrinks afterwards, which keeps isCompleted() monotone.
• BounceResult is {state, reason, outstanding}. state and reason never change.
• FailedRequest has two phases.
  • Awaiting answers: it owns the promise and the record, and resolves when every sent chunk is answered or the answer wait ends.
  • Resolved: it keeps only a weak_ptr to the record, so it is worth keeping only while a sent chunk is unanswered and the result's holders or a running gather keep the record alive.
  • answerWaitFor(trigger, requestTimeout) is 0 for kNoProgressTimeout and request_timeout_ms otherwise. Shutdown resolves unconditionally.

BounceSender keeps two tables:

• mRequests holds only active requests; active-path handlers never see a failed one.
• failRequest takes the request out of mRequests, records its unanswered sent chunks, and retires its chunks: in-flight writes and gathers become orphans as before. It defers the cancel while a write is still landing, and moves the request to mFailed.
• ACK and NACK for a non-active rid go to answerFailedRequest, which only applies the answer.
• settleFailedRequests is the only place that resolves a failed request and drops its entry, apart from failAll at shutdown. checkTimeouts runs it at the end of every IO tick, after every caller of the two functions above.
• failAll waits (bounded) for outbound writes, moves the active requests into mFailed, and resolves everything.

Receiver:

• onData claims the region first. If a scatter still holds the region, the DATA is dropped without an answer, because that scatter may be writing this very chunk. Otherwise, a DATA that does not decode, or whose region the flow no longer holds, is NACKed, so its sender stops waiting for that chunk.
• A failed scatter launch also synchronizes the stream before its NACK, so a NACK, like an ACK, follows the chunk's last write.

kBounceVersion is bumped to 3, because the sender now relies on these NACK semantics. A v2/v3 pair fails the handshake and falls back to standard NIXL; mixed versions are not supported. request_timeout_ms must be positive: BounceSender rejects a non-positive one, as the config layer already did.

Cost

• Success path: unchanged against main. There is no new allocation, clock read, lock, map operation per DATA/ACK, or message. BounceResult carries one null shared_ptr, and the per-tick sweep of mFailed is an empty loop.
• Failure path: wait() returns after the receiver's remaining answers, typically milliseconds, or within the bound above for a silent receiver.
• In-doubt entries: each one stays in mFailed while a sent chunk is unanswered and the result is held or a running orphaned gather keeps the record. Each costs a weak-pointer lock and a count read per IO tick.
• Observability: failedRequestCount() exposes the table size and is used by the tests.

Scope and known limits

• Target and ownership-mode admission. The target is the ownership mode (native/ownership.py), which polls is_completed() before releasing pages. That mode still refuses bounce (kv_cache_bounce_size_mb == 0 in _validate_fp4_mla_bridge_profile). Lifting that gate, with a bridge + bounce regression, is a follow-up PR. There is no Python change here.
• Outside ownership mode. The wait() hold-back closes the context-side failed-chunk race for callers that trust wait(), except for an in-doubt result. Generation-side cancel and multi-writer fan-in still free pages without waiting for other writers. The Python bounce avoided this with its retained bounce region, so this PR alone does not make removing the Python bounce ([None][chore] Remove the Python KV bounce buffer; kv_cache_bounce_size_mb selects the C++ agent bounce #20049) safe outside ownership mode.
• Accepted, documented trade-offs:
  • A NACK for a duplicate or stale DATA fails an active request. The protocol never resends DATA.
  • Sending DATA does not refresh lastProgress, which keeps the success path free of clock reads. A no-progress timeout right after a late DATA therefore resolves in-doubt, and a late answer still completes isCompleted().
  • An allocation failure inside failRequest can break the promise.
  • The receiver drops queued jobs on forget()/shutdown without answering. Those requests stay in-doubt, which is conservative.
  • The request-level NACK reuses chunk 0 / region 0. That is unambiguous only because it precedes every grant.
  • No dedicated test covers the stream sync after a failed scatter launch (it needs an injected stale CUDA error), the now each caller passes to failRequest, the in-doubt log line, or the request_timeout_ms > 0 check.
• Follow-ups:
  • Expose source and destination proof separately, so a context rank is not held to a dead generation peer's destination.
  • Fail an abandoned flow at once instead of through the no-progress timeout.

Test infrastructure

• The bounce gtests create their NIXL agents without the listen thread (useListenThread=false). They already wire agents with loadRemoteAgent(name, getLocalAgentDesc()). Before this change, every test agent took the shared /tmp/trtllm_nixl_port.lock. Once another user owned that file (and for root under fs.protected_regular=2), agent creation failed and every transport test was silently SKIPPED.
• The bounce reactor tests get a 300 s per-test ctest TIMEOUT, so a hang fails under its own name.

Test Coverage

• bounceFailedRequestTest (new, host-only, no GPU, about 0.3 s). It runs FailedRequest through every order of the events that can reach a failed request, for 0–2 sent chunks, with and without a running gather, and with both a normal and a zero answer wait. The events are:

  • answers, including a crossed answer that names the wrong region;
  • time passing twice;
  • the answer wait ending;
  • the gather ending;
  • the result's last holder letting go;
  • shutdown.

  After every event, a model checks that:

  • isCompleted() holds exactly when the request is resolved and nothing is outstanding, and never reverts;
  • the result resolves exactly when the wait is over;
  • the status string is correct;
  • the request is kept exactly while it still matters.

  The file also tests answerWaitFor for every reason, the status contract over hand-built results, and SourceRead.

• bounceTransportFailureTest checks the reactor around the core:

  • the answer wait: FailureWaitsForRunningScatter, FailureWaitsForQueuedScatters, NackWaitsOnlyForOtherSentChunksAndDefersCancelUntilWriteEnds, OnlyMatchingAnswersEndTheWait, AnswerWaitStartsAtTheFailure;
  • in-doubt results and late answers: SilentReceiverResolvesInDoubtAfterTimeoutSinceLastAnswer, AbandonWithSentChunkResolvesInDoubtWithinOneTimeout, LateAnswerCompletesAnInDoubtFailureAfterItsLastWrite, which uses a real receiver;
  • the source side: StatusCompletesOnlyOnceOrphanedGatherFinishes, and recycling via FailureRecyclesAGatheredChunkStillWaitingForItsCredit and FailedRequestWithUnpostedChunksStaysInert;
  • forgetPeer and shutdown: ForgetPeerFailsOnlyActiveRequestsAndLaterAnswersStillCount, ShutdownResolvesUnansweredRequestsInDoubtWithTheirOwnReason;
  • the receiver refuse rule: RefusedDataIsNacked, RefusedDataGetsNoNackWhileItsRegionScatters, DuplicateDataProducesOneScatterAndAck.

• Ordering. Events are ordered with exec-context holds, a stream gate, scripted writes and a zero-size-WANT → NACK reactor barrier. The tests sleep only where elapsed time is what they measure.

• bounceAgentE2ETest adds FailureWithNothingSentIsCompleted and an isCompleted() check on SUCCESS.

• Seeded bugs. Each of the following fails at least one test:

  • no answer-wait refresh;
  • never dropping a resolved request;
  • resolving only on the deadline;
  • the resolved phase keeping the record alive;
  • ignoring source reads;
  • a zero answer wait for every trigger or for gather failures;
  • not NACKing an undecodable DATA;
  • no peer check on answers to a failed request;
  • NACKing while the region scatters;
  • decoding before claiming the region;
  • failAll ignoring the abandon cause;
  • sending the cancel while a write is in flight;
  • the sweep never resolving;
  • the sweep never erasing;
  • not recycling a gathered, credit-less chunk.

Local results (RTX A6000, CUDA_MODULE_LOADING=LAZY): bounceFailedRequestTest 4, bounceTransportFailureTest 32, bounceTransportTest 7, bounceAgentE2ETest 7, all passing with 0 skipped. CI: pending /bot run; the executor_bounce pass/skip counts will be added here.

PR Checklist

Please review the following before submitting your PR:

• PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.

• PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.

• Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)

• If PR introduces API changes, an appropriate PR label is added - either api-compatible or api-breaking. For api-breaking, include BREAKING in the PR title.

• Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities

• CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes

• Documentation updated as needed

• Update tava architecture diagram if there is a significant design change in PR.

• The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.

• Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.

GitHub Bot Help

To see a list of available CI bot commands, please comment /bot help.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chuangz0]

/bot run --disable-fail-fast

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #81179 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 6f065bd Link to invocation

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM
• Branch: main
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 5be3334
• Layers: Repository YAML
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Enterprise
• Run ID: eaa90875-f049-48c1-9a40-33257cc02574

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ffdef9 and cc80f04.

Files selected for processing: 13

• cpp/include/tensorrt_llm/executor/transferAgent.h
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceConfig.h
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceMessage.h
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceResult.cpp
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceResult.h
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransferStatus.h
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.cpp
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.h
• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/CMakeLists.txt
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/CMakeLists.txt
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceAgentE2ETest.cpp
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceFailedRequestTest.cpp
• cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceTransportFailureTest.cpp

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes: 2

• cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceConfig.h
• cpp/include/tensorrt_llm/executor/transferAgent.h

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

Bounce transfers now track outstanding source reads and sent chunks after failure. Failed requests remain tracked while answers arrive or a deadline expires. Transfer status reports completion based on result quiescence. Tests cover protocol behavior, failure resolution, and shutdown.

Changes

Bounce transfer quiescence

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Quiescence result and status contract cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceResult.h, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceResult.cpp, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransferStatus.h, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/transferAgent.cpp, cpp/include/tensorrt_llm/executor/transferAgent.h	BounceResult tracks unanswered chunks and active source reads. FailedRequest resolves when chunks are answered or its deadline expires. BounceTransferStatus uses result quiescence to report completion.
Receiver DATA and NACK ordering cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceMessage.h, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.cpp	The receiver reserves scattering regions before decoding DATA, drops duplicate DATA without an answer, and NACKs malformed or stale DATA. Scatter processing synchronizes the stream before a NACK. The bounce wire version is now 3, with documented chunk-answer guarantees.
Failed-request answer tracking and resolution cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.h, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceTransport.cpp, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/BounceConfig.h	The sender retains failed requests while awaiting answers for sent chunks. It matches ACKs and NACKs, applies timeout-based resolution, defers cancellation while writes remain in flight, and resolves requests during shutdown.
Failure-path validation and test wiring cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceFailedRequestTest.cpp, cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceTransportFailureTest.cpp, cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceAgentE2ETest.cpp, cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/bounceTestNixlNode.h, cpp/tests/unit_tests/executor/bounce/CMakeLists.txt, cpp/tensorrt_llm/executor/cache_transmission/nixl_utils/bounce/CMakeLists.txt	Tests cover event ordering, answer matching, timeout and shutdown behavior, DATA/NACK handling, and destination contents. End-to-end tests check successful completion and failure status. Shared agent configuration and test targets are updated.

Priority: Normal

Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~60 minutes

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant BounceSender
  participant Receiver
  participant FailedRequest
  participant BounceTransferStatus
  BounceSender->>Receiver: Send chunk DATA
  Receiver->>BounceSender: Return ACK or NACK
  BounceSender->>FailedRequest: Record matching answer
  FailedRequest->>BounceTransferStatus: Resolve failure with outstanding-access result

Loading

Suggested reviewers: mikeiovine, tabrizian

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to cc80f

The change makes bounce failures report completion only after the receiver has answered every sent chunk, or after the answer deadline expires. No concrete merge-blocking defect was found. The commit message and PR description disagree about the kBounceVersion bump, and the description should be corrected. The CI failures were reported without specific details.

Pre-merge checks: 4 · 1

Failed checks: 1 warning

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage		Docstring coverage is 50.93% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documenta…	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

Passed checks: 4 passed

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check		The title clearly identifies the fix: delay reporting bounce failure until the receiver answers every sent chunk. It includes a valid ticket and type.
Description check		The description includes the required Description, Test Coverage, and PR Checklist sections. It explains the problem, design, scope, known limits, and relevant tests in substantial detail.
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 50.93% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 108 functions across 13 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.)

Resolution

Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #81179 [ run ] completed with state FAILURE. Commit: 6f065bd
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #66874 completed with status: 'UNSTABLE'

CI Report

⚠️ Resource Maintenance — Test Coverage Reduced:

Resource maintenance in LLM/main/L0_Test-x86_64-Single-GPU #9591: L40S-PyTorch-2 is temporarily paused due to Kubernetes agent provisioning and node issues.
Affected stages:
L40S-PyTorch-2

⚠️ Multi-GPU Label Required:
Multi-GPU tests require the ci: full pre-merge approved label on this PR. Either:

• Wait for the PR to be fully approved — the label is added automatically once approval is complete. Having unresolved open comments is fine, or
• If needed, ask a member of NVIDIA/trt-llm-ci-approvers to add the label manually.
  Then re-trigger CI with the same bot command (no rebase needed).

⚠️ Action Required:

• Please check the failed tests and fix your PR
• If you cannot view the failures, ask the CI triggerer to share details
• Once fixed, request an NVIDIA team member to trigger CI again

Link to invocation

[chuangz0]

/bot run --disable-fail-fast

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #81284 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: 5ffdef9 Link to invocation

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #81284 [ run ] completed with state FAILURE. Commit: 5ffdef9
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #66973 completed with status: 'UNSTABLE'

CI Report

⚠️ Resource Maintenance — Test Coverage Reduced:

Resource maintenance in LLM/main/L0_Test-x86_64-Single-GPU #9624: L40S-PyTorch-2 is temporarily paused due to Kubernetes agent provisioning and node issues.
Affected stages:
L40S-PyTorch-2

⚠️ Multi-GPU Label Required:
Multi-GPU tests require the ci: full pre-merge approved label on this PR. Either:

• Wait for the PR to be fully approved — the label is added automatically once approval is complete. Having unresolved open comments is fine, or
• If needed, ask a member of NVIDIA/trt-llm-ci-approvers to add the label manually.
  Then re-trigger CI with the same bot command (no rebase needed).

⚠️ Action Required:

• Please check the failed tests and fix your PR
• If you cannot view the failures, ask the CI triggerer to share details
• Once fixed, request an NVIDIA team member to trigger CI again

Link to invocation

[chuangz0]

/bot run

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #81425 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: cc80f04 Link to invocation

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #81425 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: cc80f04
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #67101 completed with status: 'FAILURE'

CI Report

⚠️ Action Required:

• Please check the failed tests and fix your PR
• If you cannot view the failures, ask the CI triggerer to share details
• Once fixed, request an NVIDIA team member to trigger CI again

CI Agent Failure Analysis

Link to invocation