Repository navigation
[https://nvbugs/6631760][fix] Bump PyNvVideoCodec to >=2.2.0 to addre… - #20738
Conversation
…ss security issue (NVIDIA#20154) Signed-off-by: EmmaQiaoCh <qqiao@nvidia.com>
|
/bot run |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
WalkthroughThe ChangesPyNvVideoCodec dependency
Priority: ➖ Normal Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Change: Bug fix Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check |  |
The pull request description is incomplete. The title text is truncated and does not follow the required format. The Description and Test Coverage sections contain no author-provided content. The chec… | Provide a complete title in the required format, such as [NVBugs ID or #20154][fix] Bump PyNvVideoCodec to >=2.2.0. Explain the security issue and dependency change in the Description section. List the relevant validation or test results … |
-
Check name Status Explanation Title check The title follows the required NVBugs and type format. It clearly states that the PR bumps PyNvVideoCodec to version 2.2.0 or newer to address the security issue. Docstring Coverage No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… Linked Issues check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Out of Scope Changes check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
-
Full details: Description check
-
Explanation
The pull request description is incomplete. The title text is truncated and does not follow the required format. The Description and Test Coverage sections contain no author-provided content. The checklist is not individually reviewed.
Resolution
Provide a complete title in the required format, such as
[NVBugs ID or #20154][fix] Bump PyNvVideoCodec to >=2.2.0. Explain the security issue and dependency change in the Description section. List the relevant validation or test results in Test Coverage. Review and mark the applicable checklist items individually; mark the final confirmation box after review.
✨ Finishing Touches: 💡 1
-
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks: 💡
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
PR_Github #79587 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
Automatically added "ci: full pre-merge approved" because this PR has satisfied the required GitHub review approvals. Unresolved review conversations and other required checks remain independent merge requirements. |
|
PR_Github #79587 [ run ] completed with state
|
|
/bot run --disable-fail-fast |
|
PR_Github #79811 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
/bot skip --comment "Most test jobs passed, remaining B200 stages are queuing due to limitation of resource." |
|
PR_Github #80015 [ skip ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #79811 [ run ] completed with state |
|
PR_Github #80015 [ skip ] completed with state |
…ss security issue (#20154)
Dev Engineer Review
requirements.txtnow requiresPyNvVideoCodec>=2.2.0. This addresses the reported security issue linked to NVBugs 6631760 and issue#20154. Verify compatibility with supported codec workflows because the constraint permits future major versions.QA Engineer Review
No test changes.
Per-File QA Perspective
requirements.txt: Dependency installation now selects version 2.2.0 or newer. Verify installation and video codec workflows.Description
Test Coverage
PR Checklist
Please review the following before submitting your PR:
PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.
PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.
Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)
If PR introduces API changes, an appropriate PR label is added - either
api-compatibleorapi-breaking. Forapi-breaking, includeBREAKINGin the PR title.Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities
CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes
Documentation updated as needed
Update tava architecture diagram if there is a significant design change in PR.
The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.
Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.
GitHub Bot Help
To see a list of available CI bot commands, please comment
/bot help.