Skip to content

Fixing typo 44% -> 42% #242

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ilaflott merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

Fixing typo 44% -> 42% #242

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion notebooks/ML_EPMT_2026.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ This document also exists for the purpose of making it easier for me to one day

Unfortunately, this work failed to produce a model that predicts cpu_time well. The best $R^2$ results were 0.42 using the HistGradientBoostingRegressor.

While this exploratory phase did not yield a model ready for production, it successfully established a strong baseline. This successfully explains 44% of the variance in CPU utilization. However, this may suggest that a significant portion of `cpu_time` variance is likely driven by features not yet explored from or not yet captured by the EPMT database.
While this exploratory phase did not yield a model ready for production, it successfully established a strong baseline. This successfully explains 42% of the variance in CPU utilization. However, this may suggest that a significant portion of `cpu_time` variance is likely driven by features not yet explored from or not yet captured by the EPMT database.

## Dataset Curation & Features

Expand Down
Loading