Skip to content

merge#3

Open
Karamsandhu2516 wants to merge 2 commits intoLondheShubham153:masterfrom
Karamsandhu2516:master
Open

merge#3
Karamsandhu2516 wants to merge 2 commits intoLondheShubham153:masterfrom
Karamsandhu2516:master

Conversation

@Karamsandhu2516
Copy link

@Karamsandhu2516 Karamsandhu2516 commented Dec 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded Java runtime from version 17 to 21 for improved performance and enhanced security features
    • Implemented containerized deployment infrastructure with automated health monitoring and resource management to ensure application reliability and operational efficiency

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Karamjit Kaur and others added 2 commits December 11, 2025 23:23
Updated deployment configuration for quotes-app.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes upgrade the Docker base image from Java 17 to Java 21 on Alpine Linux and introduce a complete Kubernetes deployment stack, including namespace isolation, pod configuration, service exposure, and a deployment controller with liveness and readiness probes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Container Image Update
Dockerfile
Upgraded base image to eclipse-temurin:21-jdk-alpine; removed maintainer, version, and description labels; added comment marking line change
Kubernetes Infrastructure
namespaces.yml, service.yml, pod.yml, deployment.yml
Added Kubernetes manifests defining a complete deployment stack: namespace "quoteapp", ClusterIP service exposing port 80 to target port 8000, pod with resource limits (CPU 100m/500m, memory 256Mi/512Mi), and a Deployment controller with 2 replicas featuring liveness and readiness probes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

  • Verify image tag consistency (quotesapp:latest) across all manifests
  • Confirm liveness/readiness probe endpoints (/healthz, /ready) exist in the application
  • Validate resource limits are appropriate for the application's expected load
  • Check namespace naming consistency (quoteapp vs. quotes-app)

Poem

🐰 From Java's old seventeen, we leap to twenty-one so keen,
Kubernetes manifests unfold, a deployment story to be told,
Namespaces, pods, and services aligned, probes and replicas perfectly designed! 🚀

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The pull request title 'merge' is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about the actual changes in the changeset. Replace with a descriptive title that summarizes the main changes, such as 'Add Kubernetes manifests and update Dockerfile to Java 21'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c184ddb and 910c1c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • deployment.yml (1 hunks)
  • namespaces.yml (1 hunks)
  • pod.yml (1 hunks)
  • service.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
pod.yml

[medium] 1-22: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[medium] 1-22: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

deployment.yml

[medium] 1-46: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[medium] 1-46: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
namespaces.yml (1)

1-4: LGTM!

The namespace definition is minimal and correct. It provides proper isolation for the deployment stack.

service.yml (1)

1-18: LGTM!

Service configuration is sound: ClusterIP type, correct port mapping (80→8000), and selectors properly aligned with pod/deployment labels.

Dockerfile (1)

3-3: Base image upgrade is appropriate.

Upgrading from OpenJDK 17 to eclipse-temurin:21-jdk-alpine is a good choice for security and long-term support. Eclipse Temurin is a well-maintained OpenJDK distribution.

deployment.yml (1)

29-46: Verify probe endpoint availability and configuration.

The deployment defines both liveness and readiness probes targeting /healthz and /ready endpoints. Confirm that:

  1. Your Java application (Main.java) exposes these HTTP endpoints on port 8000.
  2. The probe timing is appropriate: liveness restarts after 3 failures (~15s), readiness removes from service after 1 failure (immediate).
  3. The /ready endpoint reflects the true readiness state of your application.

Verify that your Main.java application exposes both /healthz and /ready endpoints on port 8000.

Comment on lines +20 to +46
spec:
containers:

- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 8000


livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /healthz
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 20
periodSeconds: 5
timeoutSeconds: 5
failureThreshold: 3


readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 10
timeoutSeconds: 3
failureThreshold: 1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add security context to restrict privileges.

The deployment lacks a securityContext to enforce non-root execution and prevent privilege escalation. This is a security and compliance gap flagged by static analysis.

Apply this diff to add a restrictive security context:

     spec:
       containers:
       - name: quotes-app 
         image: quotesapp:latest
         ports:
         - containerPort: 8000
+        securityContext:
+          runAsNonRoot: true
+          runAsUser: 1000
+          allowPrivilegeEscalation: false

Note: Ensure your Java application can run as user 1000. If needed, adjust the UID accordingly.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
spec:
containers:
- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 8000
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /healthz
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 20
periodSeconds: 5
timeoutSeconds: 5
failureThreshold: 3
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 10
timeoutSeconds: 3
failureThreshold: 1
spec:
containers:
- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 8000
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 1000
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /healthz
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 20
periodSeconds: 5
timeoutSeconds: 5
failureThreshold: 3
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 8000
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 10
timeoutSeconds: 3
failureThreshold: 1
🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)

[medium] 1-46: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[medium] 1-46: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In deployment.yml around lines 20 to 46, the container spec lacks a
securityContext to enforce non-root execution and prevent privilege escalation;
add a restrictive securityContext for the quotes-app container that sets
runAsUser to 1000 (or an appropriate UID for the Java app), sets runAsNonRoot:
true, disables privilege escalation (allowPrivilegeEscalation: false), drops all
capabilities (capabilities.drop: ["ALL"]), and sets a readonly root filesystem
where possible; keep settings conservative and confirm the Java process runs
correctly as the chosen UID, adjusting UID if needed.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add resource requests and limits to prevent resource starvation.

Unlike the pod.yml manifest which defines memory and CPU requests/limits, this deployment lacks resource controls. Without these, pods can consume excessive cluster resources and starve other workloads.

Apply this diff to add resource constraints:

     spec:
       containers:
       - name: quotes-app 
         image: quotesapp:latest
         ports:
         - containerPort: 8000
+        resources:
+          requests:
+            memory: "256Mi"
+            cpu: "100m"
+          limits:
+            memory: "512Mi"
+            cpu: "500m"
         securityContext:
           runAsNonRoot: true
           runAsUser: 1000
           allowPrivilegeEscalation: false

(Values suggested to match pod.yml; adjust based on actual application requirements.)

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)

[medium] 1-46: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[medium] 1-46: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In deployment.yml around lines 20 to 46, the container spec for "quotes-app"
lacks resource requests and limits; add a resources block under the container
(properly indented) with requests and limits for cpu and memory matching the
values used in pod.yml (or appropriate app-specific values) to prevent resource
starvation; ensure both requests and limits are set and formatted like in
pod.yml so Kubernetes can schedule and throttle the pod correctly.

LABEL maintainer="trainwithshubham@gmail.com"
LABEL version="1.0"
LABEL description="A Java Quotes application"
# Dockerfile: Line 2 (Change this line)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Remove the debug/TODO comment before merging.

Line 2 contains "# Dockerfile: Line 2 (Change this line)", which appears to be a placeholder or debug artifact that should not be in production code.

Apply this diff to remove the debug comment:

-# Dockerfile: Line 2 (Change this line)
-FROM eclipse-temurin:21-jdk-alpine
+FROM eclipse-temurin:21-jdk-alpine
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Dockerfile: Line 2 (Change this line)
FROM eclipse-temurin:21-jdk-alpine
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Dockerfile around line 2, remove the placeholder debug comment "# Dockerfile:
Line 2 (Change this line)" so the file contains only intended Dockerfile
instructions; update the line by deleting that comment and ensure no leftover
TODO/debug comments remain before merging.

Comment on lines +1 to +22
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: quote-pod
namespace: quoteapp
labels:
app: quotes
tier: backend
spec:
containers:
- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
ports:
- containerPort: 8000
resources:
requests:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "100m"
limits:
memory: "512Mi"
cpu: "500m"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add security context to restrict privileges.

The pod lacks a securityContext to enforce non-root execution and prevent privilege escalation. This is a security and compliance gap.

Apply this diff to add a restrictive security context:

 spec:
   containers:
   - name: quotes-app
     image: quotesapp:latest
     imagePullPolicy: Never
     ports:
     - containerPort: 8000
+    securityContext:
+      runAsNonRoot: true
+      runAsUser: 1000
+      allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
     resources:

Note: Ensure that the Java application in the Dockerfile runs correctly as user 1000 (non-root). You may need to adjust the user ID if your application requires a specific UID.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: quote-pod
namespace: quoteapp
labels:
app: quotes
tier: backend
spec:
containers:
- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
ports:
- containerPort: 8000
resources:
requests:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "100m"
limits:
memory: "512Mi"
cpu: "500m"
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: quote-pod
namespace: quoteapp
labels:
app: quotes
tier: backend
spec:
containers:
- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
ports:
- containerPort: 8000
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 1000
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
resources:
requests:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "100m"
limits:
memory: "512Mi"
cpu: "500m"
🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)

[medium] 1-22: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[medium] 1-22: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In pod.yml around lines 1-22, the Pod lacks a securityContext to enforce
non-root execution and prevent privilege escalation; add a restrictive Pod-level
securityContext (e.g., runAsUser: 1000, runAsGroup: 1000, fsGroup: 1000,
runAsNonRoot: true) and a container-level securityContext (e.g.,
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false, privileged: false, readOnlyRootFilesystem:
true, seccompProfile if desired) to ensure the container runs as a non-root UID
and cannot escalate privileges; verify and adjust the UID (1000) to match the
Java app’s user in the Docker image if necessary.

containers:
- name: quotes-app
image: quotesapp:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Reconsider imagePullPolicy: Never for production use.

This policy requires the image to be pre-loaded on each node, which is fragile and error-prone in production environments. Pods will fail silently if the image isn't already present.

Consider changing to IfNotPresent (default) or Always depending on your deployment strategy.

Apply this diff to use a production-friendly policy:

-    imagePullPolicy: Never
+    imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
imagePullPolicy: Never
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In pod.yml around line 13, imagePullPolicy is set to Never which requires
container images to be preloaded on every node and can cause silent pod failures
in production; change the policy to a production-friendly value such as
IfNotPresent (to use local image if available, otherwise pull) or Always (to
always pull the latest image) depending on your deployment workflow, update the
manifest to use the chosen policy, and ensure your CI/CD or node image cache
strategy matches that choice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments